Table of Contents |
Diana, Goddess
of the Hunt — for Ancestors!
|
Every-Name Index |
Abraham CORBIN I
Rachael MARSHALL |
In his 1989 book, Baltimore County Families, 1659-1759 (see quote below), Barnes suggests that the Abraham CORBIN who married Rachael MARSHALL was probably the Abraham CORBIN, born 7 Sep 1722, who was son of Edward & Jane (WILKINSON) CORBIN. Such a connection is immediately suspect because it would make our subject age 44 at first marriage. We do, however, have good evidence that our subject was the son of Nicholas CORBIN and brother to Nicholas's son, Benjamin CORBIN. Please see the depositions on this page, the key parts of which being that Benjamin was brother to an Abraham and both were sons of Nicholas, and the letter on this page, the key part of which being that Benjamin's sister [Sophia CORBIN] married a MARSH [Thomas] — see the spouses of the Children below. |
CLARIFICATION: what I'm driving at is that a generation has been skipped. Based on the evidence, it appears this Abraham is Edward's grandson, not his son. |
Husband: Abraham CORBIN
Birth: ca. 1743 Death: 7 Oct 1793, Baltimore Co., MD Father: Nicholas CORBIN Mother possibly: Eleanor __?__ The average male is age 23 at first marriage, hence my estimate that our subject was born ca. 1743. |
Marriage: 4 Dec 1766, Baltimore Co., MD |
Wife: Rachael / Rachel MARSHALL
Birth: ca. 1747 Death: aft. 1800, presumably in Bourbon Co., KY The average female is age 19 at first marriage, hence my estimate that our subject was born ca. 1747. She cannot have been much older because she had a child in 1788, and most women have had their last child by the age of 43 (average age for the onset of menopause is 41). |
Children — born in Baltimore Co., MD: |
1. Thomas CORBIN, b. ca. 1767/8; m. Nancy TURNER — stayed
in MD
By 1800, all the remaining children had moved to Bourbon Co., KY, either before or with their mother: 2. Sarah
CORBIN, b. 1769/70, PA; m. 1788, Thomas MARSH, Jr., s/o Thomas MARSH
& Sophia CORBIN
|
Keywords for search engines: genealogy; USA, US, United States, Kentucky, Maryland, Pennsylvania |
Sources:
1a. Robert Barnes. 1978/93. Maryland Marriages, 1778-1800. Genealogical Publ. Co., Baltimore, MD (Broderbund CD-195).
1b. Marriage Index: Maryland, 1655-1850. Liahona Research, Orem, UT (Broderbund CD-224):
2. St. James Parish Register, Maryland, 1787-1815 (online at Ancestry.com):
3. 1790 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com; Image #15 of 55; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•
4. Census Index: U.S. Selected Counties, 1800 (Broderbund CD-312):
5. Robert W. Barnes. 1989. Baltimore County Families, 1659-1759. Genealogical Publ. Co., Baltimore, MD (Broderbund CD-195):
6. LDS. Family Search: Internet Genealogy Service: International Genealogical Index (IGI).
7. Mrs. H. K. McAdams. 1929. Kentucky Pioneer and Court Records. Lexington, KY (online at HeritageQuest at Genealogy.com):
8. Broderbund. World Family Trees. Vol. 40, Pedigree No. 356. 9. WorldConnect (online at RootsWeb.com). A file there has daughter Sarah born in 1760, which does not jibe with her parents having married in 1766 and her age in the 1850 census, which indicates a birthyear of 1769/70. |
Contact | Home Page |
Table of Contents |
DNA Hub |
Biddle DNA |
Carrico DNA |
Corbin DNA |
Cupp DNA |
Danish DNA |
Ely DNA |
Lyon(s) DNA |
Rasey DNA |
Reason DNA |
Rose DNA |
Straub DNA |
Pedigree Charts |
Census Records |
Every-Name Indices |
Everything I have is online at this web site. I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case, There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page. |
"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal
on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go? The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control. |
Table of Contents
|
Privacy
Policy ______
|
Every-Name Index
|