Abraham CORBIN & Eleanor BOSLEY

Table of Contents

Diana, Goddess of the Hunt — for Ancestors!

Every-Name Index

Abraham CORBIN
Eleanor BOSLEY

Husband: Abraham CORBIN
Birth: ca. 1775
Death apparently: 1810-20, Nicholas Co., KY
Occupation: farmer
Father: Abraham CORBIN
Mother: Rachael MARSHALL

Marriage: 1 Oct 1798, Baltimore Co., MD

Wife: Eleanor "Ellen / Ella" BOSLEY
Birth: ca. 1779
Death apparently: 1840-50, Christian Co., KY
Occupation: homemaker
Father: James BOSLEY
Mother: Temperance MARSH

Children — born in Nicholas? Co., KY:

1. Joshua CORBIN, b. 1800/1
2. Gamaliel CORBIN, b. 1800/1
3. Nathan CORBIN, b. 1800-1810

Note that Ellen had a brother named, Gamaliel, Abraham had a brother named Nathan, and the name, Joshua, runs in Abraham's family.

Keywords for search engines: genealogy; USA, US, United States, Kentucky, Maryland

Sources:

1a. Marriage Index: Maryland, 1655-1850. Liahona Research, Orem, UT (Broderbund CD-224):

Corbin, Abraham Bosley, Eleanor 1 Oct 1798 Baltimore Co.

1b. LDS. Family Search: Internet Genealogy Service: IGI - International Genealogical Index (online at FamilySearch.org).

Abraham CORBIN
Spouse: Eleanor BOSLEY
Marriage: 01 Oct 1798, Baltimore, Maryland
Source: Baltimore County (Maryland) Marriage Licenses, 1777-1846. Baltimore County (Maryland). Clerk of the Circuit Court

2. 1800 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com): the 1800 KY census was destroyed.

3. 1810 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #9 of 15 — list was roughly alphabetized; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

1810 KY Nicholas Co. Roll 8 p. 59/414 Ln. 20 Corbin Abrahm 21010-20010-03

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

2 males 9 or under 1800-1810 = Gamaliel (b. 1800/1)
= Joshua (b. 1800/1)

1 male 10-15 1794-1800 = Son A

1 male 26-44 1765-1784 = Abraham (b. ca. 1775)

2 females 9 or under 1800-1810 = Daughter B
= Daughter A

1 female 26-44 1765-1784 = Eleanor (b. ca. 1779)

3 slaves all ages by 1810 = ? ? ?

4. 1820 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #14 of 25; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

1820 KY Nicholas Co. Roll M33_20 p. 118 Ln. 4 Ellin Corbin 010200-11010-0-300 1010-2001

These data indicate:

No., Race, Gender Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

1 white male 10-15 1804-1810 = Nathan?

2 white males 19-25* 1794-1801 = Gamaliel (b. 1800/1)
= Joshua (b. 1800/1)

1 white female 9 or under 1810-1820 = Daughter C

1 white female 10-15 1804-1810 = Daughter A or B

1 white female 26-44 1775-1794 = Elleanor (b. ca. 1779)

3 people engaged in agriculture

1 male slave 13 and under 1806-1820 = ?

1 male slave 26-44 1775-1794 = ?

2 female slaves 13 and under 1806-1820 = ? ?

1 female slave 45 or over in or bef. 1775 = ?

*In the 1820 Census, the third column is age class 16-18 and the fourth column is age class 16-25; therefore, any individual in column three is duplicated in column four. By subtracting the number in column three from the number in column four, you can create an age class 19-25.

5. 1830 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com; Image #25 of 94 — indexed "Corbirs"; list was roughly alphabetized; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

1830 KY Nicholas Co. Roll M19_40 p. 190 Ln. 5 Joshua Corbin 100 001 - 000 110 010 100100-000010

These data indicate:

No., Race, Gender Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

1 white male 4 or under 1825-1830 = Abram

1 white male 30-39 1790-1800 = Joshua (b. 1800)

1 white female 15-19 1810-1815 = probable sister of Joshua

1 white female 20-29 1800-1810 = Rachel (b. 1806)

1 white female 50-59 1770-1780 = Eleanor (BOSLEY) CORBIN (b. ca. 1779)

1 male slave 9 or under 1820-1830 = ?

1 male slave 36-54 1775-1794 = ?

1 female slave 55-99 1730-1775 = ?

Rachel's mother died in 1810, so the older woman does appear to be Joshua's mother.

6. 1840 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #55-56 of 94; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

1840 KY Christian Co. Roll 107 pp. 218B-219A Ln. 25 Joshua Corbin 021 000 100 - 010 001 001 010000-010100 0600000

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

2 white males 5-9 1830-1835 = Nathan (b. 1832/3)
= Benedict Beale (b. 1830/1)

1 white male 10-14 1825-1830 = Abram

1 white male 40-49 1790-1800 = Joshua (b. 1800)

1 white female 5-9 1830-1835 = Sarah (b. 1834/5)

1 white female 30-39 1800-1810 = Rachel (b. 1806)

1 white female 60-69 1770-1780 = Eleanor (BOSLEY) CORBIN (b. ca. 1779)

1 male slave 10-23 1816-1830 = ?

1 female slave 10-23 1816-1830 = ?

1 female slave 36-54 1785-1804 = ?

6 persons employed in agriculture

Again, the older woman appears to be Joshua's mother.

7. 1850 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com): not found.

8. Messages posted to the Bosley Family Genealogy Forum (online at GenForum.com) including this one (#283):

Capt. James Bosley (whose father is also called Capt. James) md Temperance Marsh and had... Ellen, md Nathan Corbin...

Primary records show Eleanor BOSLEY married Abraham CORBIN. Another message by this same poster (#478) indicates a belief that Abraham and Nathan are the same person, but see my reply (#556).

9. WorldConnect / Ancestry World Trees (online at RootsWeb.com/Ancestry.com).

Contact Home
Page Table of
Contents DNA
Hub Biddle
DNA Carrico
DNA Corbin
DNA Cupp
DNA Danish
DNA Ely
DNA Lyon(s)
DNA Rasey
DNA Reason
DNA Rose
DNA Straub
DNA Pedigree
Charts Census
Records Every-Name
Indices

Everything I have is online at this web site. I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case,
please include a link to the page you are referencing.
There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page.

"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go?
The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control.

Table of Contents

Every-Name Index