Go to Family Tree DNA Web Site
 
The RASEY Y-chromosome DNA Surname Project
including Variations, such as, RAZEE, RACEY, RAZEY, RASAY, RAASAY, RAASEY,  RACIE, 
RASSY, RAYSAY, RACEE, RACY, RASY, RAZY, RACE, RAZE, RAISEY, RAISY, RASIE, RAYSE, etc.
The purpose of this project is to utilize Y-chromosome DNA testing as a tool for genealogical research on surname RASEY and other phonetically similar surnames.  At this early stage in the project, the most burning questions have to do with the relationships between the U.S. immigrants, that is, between the American progenitors and their origins in Europe.  DNA testing is ideally suited to answering these questions.

Human gender is genetically determined by a pair of chromosomes that are, by convention, designated XX (for females) and XY (for males).  Only males have the Y-chromosome, and because the male Y-chromosome is handed down intact from father to son through the generations (except for rare mutations), Y-DNA testing can identify common ancestors on patrilineal (direct male) lines.

If you are researching any of these surnames or their variations, please consider having a male family member submit a sample to the project.  The more participants we have, the more we will learn about our origins!

—  Introduction to Genealogy and Genetics  —  FAQs  —

View the Alternate Project Web Site at FamilyTreeDNA
This site includes a distribution map of member origins.
Project Join Request Form
DNA Test Results and Lineages

The RASEY Y-chromosome DNA Surname Project was opened on 2 Feb 2006.  As of May 2008, the project has three members, with results returned for all three.  These three project members represent two of the key RASEY/RAZEE/etc. progenitors in the United States.

This DNA project is based on STR (short tandem repeat) testing of the male Y-chromosome.  Test results consist of numbers which represent the counts of the number of times a DNA segment is duplicated at a given marker (locus or location).  Closely related individuals will have the same counts at the same markers, that is, the degree of similarity of the test results is a measure of how closely two people are related. The more markers you test, the more precise the determination of relationship.  At FamilyTreeDNA, four levels of Y-chromosome STR testing are offered to group members: 12-, 25-, 37-, and 67-marker tests.  Every level of testing tells you something, but most project members will want to test at least 37 markers.  Collectively, the pattern of numbers resulting from STR testing is called a person's haplotype (or "motif").

STR testing measures relationship in a time frame of hundreds of years, making the distance to the MRCA (most recent common ancestor) sufficiently close to be genealogically useful.  And "useful" is an understatement.  STR testing is a powerful tool for determing whether people do or do not share a recent common ancestor.

There is another form of Y-chromosome DNA testing called SNP testing — the acronym stands for "single nucleotide polymorphism" and is pronounced as a single word, "snip."  Results of SNP testing are expressed as + or - (positive or negative) to indicate the presence or absence of a particular mutation.  Each suspected mutation requires a separate test.  Results of SNP testing determine a person's haplogroup, and deep testing can identify subgroups, called "subclades."

The haplogroup (sometimes abbreviated, "Hg") is a measure of deep ancestry.  The MRCA may be thousands of years in the past, which places the individual's ancestry in a paleoanthropological time frame.  Haplogroup determination is of practical use for the project because it broadly defines and separates the most distinct family groups; that is, families with no prospect whatsoever of a connection in "genealogical time," making it a useful way to divide up the project.  For the individual, knowing one's SNP subclade greatly enhances one's appreciation of history because the literature on the genetic history of humanity, correlated with historic and pre-historic events, is growing rapidly.  Speaking personally, compiling my genealogy greatly enhanced my appreciation of U.S. and European history, while discovering my parents' haplogroups has enhanced my appreciation of the global history of humanity.  I wish I had known these things about myself when I was growing up, but at least the future children in the family will know.

If the STR-based haplotype is reasonably common (or similar to one that is), it can be used to deduce the probable SNP haplogroup, making the expense of actual SNP testing optional.  On the other hand, a haplogroup deduction based on a rare or unique haplotype can be wrong (due to small sample size), so a SNP test is recommended in such cases — assuming the subject is interested in an accurate haplogroup designation.  Haplogroup determination is (to me) a fun thing to know about oneself, but it is not a requisite for full participation in this project, which is based on the results of STR testing, not SNP testing.

Despite the apparent coincidence of being in the same haplogroup subclade and variety, I2b1-Continental (old I1c or I1b2a), their haplotypes indicate that descendants of the two progenitors are not closely related.
Progenitor 1:
Joseph RASEY I of Worcester Co., MA, then Cheshire Co., NH, who married Mary HOLLON.
This individual's haplotype is unique at 37 (and thus 67) markers, with no full or even near matches in either the FTDNA or Ysearch databases.  Being Haplogroup I2b1 effectively debunks the legend of a connection to Malcolm MacLEOD of the Isle of Raasay, whose kin are Haplogroup R1b.  Given that they are different haplogroups, Joseph RASAY cannot have had a common ancestor with any MacLEOD line for tens of thousands of years.
Progenitor 2:
Joseph RAZEE I of Bristol Co., MA, then Providence Co., RI, who married first Sarah WHIPPLE and second Widow Mercy (WHITE?) DAVIS. 
These two individual's match each other 35/37 (genetic distance 3), with all the differences being on fast-mutating markers.  This result is consistent with them having a near common ancestor and supports their paper connection.  The one tested to 67 markers has only a 54/67 match (genetic distance 18) with the descendant of Joseph RASEY I, which means they are not closely related (not in "genealogical time"), effectively disproving the assertion that Joseph RAZEE I was the father of Joseph RASEY I.  (If the two Joseph's were father and son, we would expect their descendants to be matching at the level of at least 64/67).

Upgrades Pending

No members are awaiting upgrades


First Results Pending

No new members are awaiting results.

SUBSIDIZED TESTING!

If you want to increase the probability of making a match and speed up the progress of this project, offer to subsidize a test, even if it's with just $10.  Donations can easily be made through the project's General Fund (see below).

A researcher is offering to pay in full for a 12-marker test for a patrilineal male descendant of:

Joseph RASEY I (c1734- ) of Worcester Co., MA, then Cheshire Co., NH

Your project administrator is hereby offering to subsidize 50% of the cost of a 67-marker test for one patrilineal descendant of each of the progenitors listed below:

John RASYE / RASEY / RAZEY (b. ca. 1530s), of Wiltshire, England 

Luke RACEY (1750-1813), of Norfolk, England, who settled in Hampshire Co., WV

James RASEY / RACEY / RACY (1792-1883) of Franklin Co., NY

A similar offer is also made to:
 

Any RASEY/RASAY/RACEY/RAZEY/etc. born in and living in Scotland, England, or France,
with patrilineal ancestors born in the same country (i.e., with known "roots").

Each offer above is good for one test subject only, so the early bird gets the test!

For all subsidies, subject must be willing to join this RASEY project here at FamilyTreeDNA and opt for a full 67-marker test.  Subjects must be surnamed RASEY or variant and descend from the indicated ancestor on a patrilineal (direct male) line — no females can break the line of descent.  Acceptance of the subject is at the discretion of the donor (i.e., upon the researcher's satisfaction that there is a valid paper connection between the test subject and the ancestor), and the test subject must agree to sign the Release to allow sharing of his test results.  Please note that sharing of results does not mean sharing of identity.  Only the project administrator necessarily has to know the identity of the test subject, though normally FamilyTreeDNA and matching test subjects would also know, but even they can be excluded from knowing.

General Funds

In recognition of the fact that some individuals may find the cost of DNA testing prohibitive and that these individuals may be the only representatives of key lines in our genealogical research, Family Tree DNA has instituted "General Funds" to allow researchers to subsidize the testing of these key individuals.  The fund can also be used as a simple way to give someone a gift of DNA testing.  Please see this link at Family Tree DNA for more details.  And please consider a donation to the project as a way of bringing more lines into the project, especially to help some of our elder kin be tested who may not otherwise be able to afford it.  There is also a field on the donation form allowing you to make a donation in honor of a specific person.  The funds will be entirely collected and held by Family Tree DNA, but their dispursement is implemented by your project administrator.  You can inform your project adminstrator whose test you want subsidized with your donation or, if you wish, you can leave it up to the project administrator to decide where the funds can best be applied.  Please note that anonymous donations are not just anonymous to the public; they are also anonymous to the project admin.  If you want the admin to know you made the donation and/or have a special request for how it is to be spent, please notify the admin by email at the time you make the donation.

There has been an instance in one of my projects where a donor sent a prospective member a check, then the person never followed through by joining the project.  This situation can be avoided if the researcher has, instead, donated the money to the project's General Fund, because the money simply won't be spent if the person fails to join.

There has also been an instance in one of my projects where a donor agreed to fund a test based on the promise of a secure line to their progenitor, only for me to discover there was an adoption in the line.  In this case, the researcher had donated their money to the General Fund, and I caught the NPE in time to deny the subsidy to the test subject.  This situation is also a reminder to examine someone's line, yourself, before agreeing to subsidize their test — not that there was intentional deception here, just flawed paper genealogy.

Once money is donated to the General Fund, it cannot be refunded to the donor, but at least it's use can be determined by the donor in the future, as opposed to being a total loss.

Bottom line:  before sending a stranger a check, please consider making a donation to the project's General Fund, instead.

RASEY-DNA Mailing List
Anyone interested is welcome to join the list, whether a member of the DNA project, or not.

Note that the above is a different list from the
RASEY Surname Mailing List at RootsWeb,
which you are also welcome to join, of course.

Every-Name Index to RASEY / RACEY / RAZEE / etc. Family Group Sheets

Link to /R/ Folder to Browse Family Group Sheets by Husband's Surname

Links Hub for RASEY / RACEY / RAZEE / etc. U.S. Census Records

RASEY / RACEY / RAZEE / etc. of Note

Arthur George RACEY (1870-1941), of Montreal, QC — fine artist, political cartoonist
Jean RASEY (living), of Duluth, MN — actress
Patricia A. RASEY (living), of Napoleon, OH — author

How Our Surnames Rank in Frequency in the 1990 U.S. Census
RACEY 23470
RASEY 29783
RAZEY 60901
The list of surnames at the www.census.gov web site ranks the top 88,799 surnames in the 1990 U.S. census.  Only three of our surnames appear in the rankings; all other spelling variations (at least the ones I could think to try using the Find feature of my browser) are too rare to be listed.
The project administrator and webmaster is yours truly, Diana Gale Matthiesen.  I am a volunteer and receive no financial remuneration of any kind from FamilyTreeDNA, nor am I even one of their "web affiliates" (i.e., I don't profit from "click throughs").  I'm a retired zoologist/paleontologist, and genealogy is my hobby.

My interest in RASEY stems from my descent from Joseph RASEY I, even though I "daughter out" in the 4th generation:  Joseph I > Joseph II > Joseph III > Polly, who married Willard BROWN.

Contact Home
Page
Biddle
DNA
Carrico
DNA
Corbin
DNA
Danish
DNA
Rasey
DNA
Straub
DNA
Submit
Lineage
Census
Hubs
Every-Name
Indices

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

-