Go to Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Diana, Goddess of the Hunt for Ancestors!
Go to Every-Name Index
Every-Name Index
Sarah Ann SITTON
Husband:  James CORBIN
Birth:  10 Mar 1794, Pendleton Dist. [now Pickens Co.], SC
Death:  31 Aug 1879, Habersham Co., GA
Father:  Peter CORBIN
Mother:  Elizabeth __?__
Marriage:  25 Dec 1814, Pendleton Dist., SC
Wife:  Sarah Ann SITTON
Birth:  9 Jun 1798, Pendleton Dist. [now Pickens Co.], SC
Death:  aft. 1870 census
Father:  John SITTON III  (1763-1843)
Mother:  Sarah RIGSBY
Children born in Pendleton Dist. [now Pickens Co.], SC:
1.  Bartlett "Bartley" Hughes CORBIN, b. 25 Nov 1815
2.  Peter M. CORBIN, b. 2 Jul 1819; d. 26 Jul 1822
3.  James Harley CORBIN, b. 2 Aug 1821
Keywords for search engines:  genealogy; USA, US, United States, Georgia, South Carolina

Sources (n.b., Pickens Co. was formed in 1826 from Pendleton Dist.):

1.  Marriage Record:

2.  1820 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #63 of 67; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
1820 SC Pendleton Roll M33_120 p. 91/225 Ln. 34 James Corban 200010-00100-1*
These data indicate:
No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred
2 males 9 or under 1810-1820 = Peter (b. 1819)
= Bartlett (b. 1815)
1 male 26-44 1775-1794 = James (b. 1794)
1 female 16-25 1794-1804 = Sarah (b. 1798)
1 person engaged in agriculture?
*This is not a standard notation for 1820, so the "1" may mean something other than the number engaged in agriculture.  I doubt that it means "foreigners" because there are too many on the page.  The one other thing it might mean is the number of slaves.

3.  1830 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #X; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
1830 - - Co. - Twp. Roll - p. - Ln. - - - -
These data indicate:

4.  1840

5.  1850 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #4-5 of 14 indexed "Bartlly Carlan"):  Hogtown Dist., Lumpkin Co., GA, Roll, pp. 91B-92A, 32/_, enumerated 26 Oct 1850 , official enumeration date 1 Jun 1850 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
Barttly Corban 32 M   Farmer 150 SC
Susan     do 30 F       Ga
Mary      do  9 F       "
Sarah     do  9 F       "
Eliza     do  8 F       "
[next page]
James     do  5 M       Ga
Saphronia  3 F       "
Sarah Am Corban 52 SC       "

4.  1860 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com):  can't find, nor can I find their son, Bartlett.

5.  1870 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #94 of 118): Dahlonega P.O., Lumpkin Co., GA, Roll M593_163, p. 469B, PN 94, enumerated 1 Aug 1870, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1870 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
1870:  for an explanation of the column headings, please see
What the Numbers in the Federal Census Mean (missing columns contained no data).
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 16 17 19
762 774 Corbin Bartlet 54 M W Farmer 1200 500 South Carolina     /
    ______ Susan 50 F W Keeping House     Georgia      
763 775 Corbin James 25 M W Farm Laborer   350 Georgia     /
    ______ Sophronia 22 F W Keeping House     Georgia      
    ______ Eleaner  2 F W       Georgia      
    ______ Bar?tel 13 M W Farm Laborer     Georgia      
    ______ John 12 M W Farm Laborer     Georgia / /  
    ______ Sarah 72 F W No Occupation     South Carolina   /  
    Smith Sidney 15 M W Farm Laborer     Geogia      

Public Member Trees (online at Ancestry.com).

WorldConnect / Ancestry World Trees (online at RootsWeb.com/Ancestry.com).

Contact Home
Table of
Everything I have is online at this web site.  I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case,

please include a link to the page you are referencing.
There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page.

"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go?
The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control.
Table of Contents
Go to Table of Contents
Privacy Policy ______
Every-Name Index
Go to Every-Name Index