William G. COX & Ms. __?__ & Sarah CARRICO

Table of Contents

Diana, Goddess of the Hunt — for Ancestors!

Every-Name Index

William G. COX
Ms. __?__
Sarah CARRICO

Husband: William G. COX
Birth: 1794/5, KY
Death: 4 Jan 1876, Willow Hill Twp., Jasper Co., IL
Occupation: farmer
Father: John COX (1765-1837), England > Sullivan Co., IN
Mother: Susannah "Susan" A. GROOM (c1775->1850), VA > Sullivan Co., IN

Marriage-1:

Wife-1: Ms. __?__
Birth: 1790-1800
Death: 1840-45, presumably in Sullivan Co., IN

Marriage-2: ca. 1844/5

Wife: Sarah CARRICO
Birth: 1816/7, Knox Co., Indiana Territory [now Sullivan Co., IN]
Death: 1884, Haddon Twp., Sullivan Co., IN
Occupation: homemaker
Other Spouse: m1. ca. 1836/7, John COWDEN
Father: Reason CARRICO
Mother: Elizabeth ENGLE

Children with Wife-1 — born in IN:

1. (Daughter A) COX, b. 1815-20
2. (Son A) COX, b. 1815-20
3. (Daughter B) COX, b. 1820-25
4. (Son B) COX, b. 1820-25
5. (Son C) COX, b. 1825-30
6. Isaac Jackson COX, b. 4 Nov 1829

Said to have had a son, Israel, who is presumably one of the above.

Children with Sarah CARRICO — born in Sullivan Co., IN:

7. Margaret Jane COX, b. 1845/6
8. Joseph W. COX, b. Oct 1850
9. Martha Jane COX, b. 1855/6

Keywords for search engines: genealogy; UK, United Kingdom; USA, US, United States, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Virginia

Sources:

1. Jordan R. Dodd, ed. 1993. Indiana Marriages: Early to 1850. Liahona Research, Orem, UT (Broderbund CD-228): not found. The Sullivan Co., IN, Courthouse burned in 1853, destroying almost all of the pre-1850 marriage records.

2. Census Index: U.S. Selected Counties, 1820 (Broderbund CD-314): there are five William COX'es in Indiana, but none in Sullivan Co.

3. 1830 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #43 of 76; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):

1830 IN Sullivan Co. Roll 26 p. 178 Ln. 15 Wm G Cox 211 001 - 011 001

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

2 males 4 or under 1825-1830 = Isaac (b. 1829/30)
= Son C

1 male 5-9 1820-1825 = Son B

1 male 10-14 1815-1820 = Son A

1 male 30-39 1790-1800 = William (b. 1794/5)

1 female 5-9 1820-1825 = Daughter B

1 female 10-14 1815-1820 = Daughter A

1 female 30-39 1790-1800 = Wife-1

Listed next to Henry PAGETT on one side; and, on the other side, listed two households from Reason CARRICO (father of his future wife, Sarah).

4. 1840 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #19-20 of 90; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):

1840 IN Sullivan Co. Roll 94 pp. 58B-59A Ln. 31 William G. Cox 020 110 100 - 000 100 100 0300000

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

2 males 5-9 1830-1835 = Son D
= Isaac (b. 1829/30)

1 male 15-19 1820-1825 = Son B

1 male 20-29 1810-1820 = Son A

1 male 40-49 1790-1800 = William (b. 1794/5)

1 female 15-19 1820-1825 = Daughter B

1 female 40-49 1790-1800 = Wife-1

3 persons employed in agriculture

Listed two lines after Theophilus PADGETT, who is one line after Henry PADGETT; listed four lines before Reason CARRICO (father of his future wife, Sarah).

3. 1850 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #13 of 72): District No. 105, Hadan [Haddon] Twp., Sullivan Co., IN, Roll M432_173, p. 204A, 76/78, enumerated 9 Aug 1850, official 5enumeration date 1 Jun 1850 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

William G Cox 55 M Farmer 1000 Ky

Sarah Cox 33 F Ia

Isaac J 20 M Labourer Ia

Margaret J 4 F Ia

Joseph 10/12 M Ia

Eliza Cowden 12 F Ia

Eliza COWDEN is Sarah's daughter by her first husband. Given the age gap between Isaac and Margaret and the age difference between William and Sarah, it seems fairly certain that Isaac is William's son by a former wife and that Margaret is his first child with Sarah. They are listed two households from Theophilus PADGETT.

6. 1860 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #34 of 51): Carlisle P.O., Haddon Twp., Sullivan Co., IN, Roll M653_298, p. 740, PN 34, 236/236, enumerated 16 Jun 1860, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1860 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

Wm G Cox 66 M farmer 1000 500 Ky

Sarah " 41 F Ind

Joseph " 10 M do

Margaret " 14 F do

Martha 4 F do

7. 1870 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #6 of 40): Willow Hill P.O., Willow Hill Twp., Jasper Co., IL, Roll M593_232, p. 378B, PN 6, 47/43, enumerated 19 Jul 1870, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1870 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

Cox William 76 M W Farmer 2000 600 Kentucky

___ Sarah 54 F W Keeping House Indianna

___ Joseph 20 M W works on farm Illinois

___ Martha 13 F W Illinois

8. 1880 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #9 of 27): Haddon Twp., Sullivan Co., IN, Roll T9-0313, p. 585B, PN 10, SD 4, ED 327, enumerated 8 June 1880, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1880 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

1880: for an explanation of the column headings, please see
What the Numbers in the Federal Census Mean (missing columns contained no data).

1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 11 13 24 25 26

87 87 Booker M J W F 20 / Hs wrk Ind Ind Ind

______ S J W F 20 Sis / " " " "

______ C W W M 17 Bro / Far " " "

Cox Sarrah W F 58 Mother / Hs wrk " Ky Ky

Sarah is the BOOKER children's grandmother, not their mother. They are listed next to the children's mother, Elizabeth (COWDEN) BOOKER, who is Sarah's daughter from her prior marriage.

9. Archives of the CARRICO-L and TRIMBLE-L mailing lists (online at RootsWeb.com).

Contact Home
Page Table of
Contents DNA
Hub Biddle
DNA Carrico
DNA Corbin
DNA Cupp
DNA Danish
DNA Ely
DNA Lyon(s)
DNA Rasey
DNA Reason
DNA Rose
DNA Straub
DNA Pedigree
Charts Census
Records Every-Name
Indices

Everything I have is online at this web site. I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case,
please include a link to the page you are referencing.
There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page.

"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go?
The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control.

Table of Contents

Every-Name Index