Go to Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Diana, Goddess of the Hunt for Ancestors!
Go to Every-Name Index
Every-Name Index
Ms. __?__
Husband:  Joshua KELLY / KELLEY I
Birth:  10 Apr 1752, Baltimore Co., MD
Death:  1 Oct 1834, Owen Co., IN
Father:  William KELLEY I
Mother:  Eleanor CORBIN
Wife:  Ms. __?__
Birth:  by 1765
1.  (Son A) KELLEY, b. 1774-90
2.  (Son B) KELLEY, b. 1774-90
3.  (Daughter A) KELLEY, b. bef. 1790
4.  Gideon KELLY, b. ca. 1780
5.  Nicholas KELLEY, b. ca. 1784
6.  Joshua KELLEY II, b. 11 Oct 1790, Huntingdon Co., PA
7.  (Daughter B) KELLEY, b. 1794-1800
Keywords for search engines:  genealogy; USA, US, United States, Indiana, Kentucky, Pennsylvania

Sources (n.b., the state of Kentucky was formed in 1792 from the state of Virginia):

1.  LDS.  Family Search: Internet Genealogy Service:  AF - Ancestral File (online at FamilySearch.org).
Joshua KELLEY; Born: 10 Apr 1752, Md; Died: 1 Oct 1834, Will Record
Father: William KELLY / KELLEY; Mother: Eleanor
Child: Joshua KELLY; Born: Abt 1790/1791, Pa
Source: patron submission

2.  1790 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #9 of 12; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
1790 PA Huntingdon Co. Roll M637_8 p. 127 Ln. 28L Joshua Kelly 1-4-2-0-0
These data indicate:
Gender and Type Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred
1 free white males 16 or over in or bef. 1774 = Joshua
4 free white males 15 or under 1774-1790 = Son A
= Son B
= Gideon (b. ca. 1780)
= Nicholas (b. ca. 1784)
2 free white females all ages in or bef. 1790 = Wife
= Daughter A

3.  Anon.  1991.  The 1795 Census of Kentucky [as constructed from tax lists].  T.L.C. Genealogy, Miami Beach, FL (said to include every extant tax list from every county existing in the state of Kentucky in 1795):  Joshua not found, and a tax list for Hardin County is included.

4a.  1800 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com):  can't find, which probably means he was in KY because the 1800 KY census was lost, while the PA census was not.  (The Joshua KELLEY and wife in Huntingdon Co., PA, are too young to be our subject and have no children born before 1790, so they're not the couple there in 1790.)

4b.  Census Index:  U.S. Selected Counties, 1800 (Broderbund CD-312):  This CD includes tax and other records as a substitute for missing censuses, and while there are some Joshua KELLEY/KELLYs included, none appear to be our subject.

5.  1810 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #20 of 24; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
1810 KY Hardin Co. Elizabethtown Roll 6 p. 344 Ln. 3 Joshua Kelly 00101-01001-00
These data indicate:
No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred
1 male 16-25 1784-1794 = Joshua Jr. (b. 1790)
1 male 45 or over by 1765 = Joshua
1 female 10-15 1794-1800 = Daughter B
1 female 45 or over by 1765 = Wife
Listed one line above Gideon KELLY.

6.  1820 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #8 of 9; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
1820 IN Owen Co. Roll M33_14 p. 143 Ln. 5 Joshua Kelly 000011-00001-0-000
These data indicate:
No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred
1 male 26-44 1775-1794 = ?
1 male 45 or over in or bef. 1775 = Joshua
1 female 45 or over in or bef. 1775 = Wife
Listed one line below Nicholas KELLEY, who is one line below, Joshua KELLEY II.

7.  1830 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com):  said to be living, but the only KELLEY/KELLY in Owen Co., IN, is Joshua II.  If our subject is a widower, he's likely living with a married daughter.

.  Broderbund.  World Family Trees.  Vol. 8, Pedigree #804 and #804.  Simply gives our subject as son of William KELLEY and, erroneously, Elizabeth GORSACH; no spouse or children for Joshua.

Contact Home
Table of
Everything I have is online at this web site.  I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case,

please include a link to the page you are referencing.
There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page.

"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go?
The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control.
Table of Contents
Go to Table of Contents
Privacy Policy ______
Every-Name Index
Go to Every-Name Index