Go to Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Diana, Goddess of the Hunt for Ancestors!
 
Go to Every-Name Index
Every-Name Index
Thomas CARRICO
Eliza Ann CAMBRON
Husband:  Thomas CARICO / CARRICO
Birth:  8 Nov 1807, Washington Co., KY
Death:  28 Aug 1873, Washington Co., KY
Disposition:  buried St. Rose Catholic Cemetery, Springfield, Washington Co., KY
Occupation:  farmer
Father:  Levin / Levi CARRICO
Mother:  Catharine OSBORN
Marriage:  22 Nov 1836, Washington Co., KY
Wife:  Eliza Ann CAMBRON / CAMBERON
Birth:  1800-1810 or 1812/3 Washington Co., KY
Death:  aft. 1880 census, presumably in Washington Co., KY
Occupation:  homemaker
Other Spouses:  m1. 8 Feb 1834, Washington Co., KY, Pius OZBOURN / OSBOURN / OSBORNE / OSBURN / OSBOURN / OSBURNE
Father:  William CAMBRON
Mother:  Rebecca MONTGOMERY

Eliza Ann is being confused with the Elizabeth CAMBRON (b. ca. 1793), who married Joseph B. CARRICO.  These are two different women.

Children born in Washington Co., KY:
1.  Mary Magdalene CARRICO, b. 8 Nov 1837
2.  William Levi CARRICO, b. ca. 1839
3.  Catherine / Catharine Elizabeth Rebeca CARRICO, b. 9 Feb 1841
4.  Rose Ann C. CARRICO, b. Nov 1845
Keywords for search engines:  genealogy; USA, US, United States, Kentucky

Sources:

1.  Jordan R. Dodd, ed.  1993.  Kentucky Marriages:  Early to 1850.  Liahona Research, Orem, UT (Broderbund CD-229):
Ozbourn, Pius Cambron Eliza Ann 8 Feb 1834 Washington Co.
Carrico, Thomas Ozbourn, Eliza (Mrs.) 22 Nov 1836 Washington Co.
Note that Eliza married Pius as Eliza Ann CAMBRON, not as Mrs. Elizabeth CARRICO.

2.  1840 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #69-70 of 82; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤
1840 KY Washington Co. Roll 125 pp. 131B-132A Ln. 2 Thoms Carrico 100 001 - 101 001 010000-000000 0200000
These data indicate:
No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred
1 white male 4 or under 1835-1840 = William or Son A
1 white male 30-39 1800-1810 = Thomas (b. 1807) 
1 white female 4 or under 1835-1840 = Mary (b. 1837/8)
1 white female 10-14 1825-1830 = ? 
1 white female 30-39 1800-1810 = Eliza (b. 1812/3?) 
 
1 male slave 10-23 1816-1830 = ?
2 persons employed in agriculture
Surrounded by kin (e.g., MEDLEY, CARRICO, OSBURN, BLANFORD, CAMBRON, LANUM/LANHAM).

3.  1850 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #172 of 208):  Washington Co., KY, Roll M432_221, pp. 216B-217A, 1201/1201, enumerated 26 Oct 1850, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1850 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤
Thomas Carrico 42 M   Farmer 5000 Ky
Eliza Carrico 37 F       "
Mary M Carrico 12 F       "
William L Carrico  9 M       "
Cathrine R Carrico  7 F       "
Rose A Carrico  4 F       "
Rebecca Cambron 77 F     2100 Md
Rebecca is Eliza's mother.  Cathrine's middle initial is definitely, "R."

4.  1860 Census Index/Images (online at Genealogy.com, Image #3 of 80):  Springfield P.O., District No. 2, Washington Co., KY, Roll M653_399, p., PN 3, 20/20, enumerated 4 Jun 1860, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1860 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤
Thomas Carrico 52 M   Farmer 2200 5218 Kentucky
Eliza      " 50 F         "
William    " 21 M   "     "
Catharine  " 19 F   "     "
Rose       " 15 F         "
Listed two households from their married daughter, Mary (CARRICO) HAYS, and her husband.

5.  1870 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #5-6 of 83 Thomas is indexed "Carrio," William is indexed "Calico"):  Springfield P.O., Springfield Pct., Washington Co., KY, Roll M593_502, pp. 385A-385B, PN 5-6, 25/25, enumerated 30 Jun 1870, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1870 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤
Carico Thomas 62 M W Farmer 2500 1354 Kentucky
______ Elvira 57 F W Keeping house     "
Hays Elvira  9 F W       "
____ Rosa  7 F W       "
Carico William 28 M W Farmer    515 "
_______ Augusta 22 F W Keeping house     "
_______ Charles 25 M B Farm laborer     "
_______ Hennie 16 F B House servant     "
[next page]
_______ John 10 M B Servant     Kentucky
The HAYS children are those of their late daughter, Mary (CARRICO) HAYS.  Augusta is William's wife.  I guess these are Thomas's freed slaves.  I wonder if any of them are his offspring?

6.  1880 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #11 of 43):  District No. 9, Washington Co., KY, Roll T9_445, p. 327C, PN 11, SD 4, ED 204, enumerated 7 Jun 1880, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1880 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤
1880:  for an explanation of the column headings, please see
What the Numbers in the Federal Census Mean (missing columns contained no data).
1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 13 23 24 25 26
87 87 Carrico W L W M 41     /   Farmer   Ky Ky Ky
    _______ Augusta W F 32 Wife   /   Keeping house   Ky Ky Ky
    _______ Eliza W F 61 Mother     /   / Ky Md Md
    Hays Eliza H W F 19 Niece /         Ky Ky Ky
    Hays Emma R W F 17 Niece /         Ky Ky Ky
    Carrico Angela W F  5 Dau /         Ky Ky Ky
    _______ Clara W F  1 Dau /         Ky Ky Ky
    Jarboe Vitus W M 30 Servant /     Farmer / Ky Ky Ky

7.  1890 Census:  the 1890 Census Population Schedules were destroyed.

8.  1900 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com):  not found.

9.  WorldConnect / Ancestry World Trees (online at RootsWeb.com/Ancestry.com).

Contact Home
Page
Table of
Contents
DNA
Hub
Biddle
DNA
Carrico
DNA
Corbin
DNA
Cupp
DNA
Danish
DNA
Ely
DNA
Lyon(s)
DNA
Rasey
DNA
Reason
DNA
Rose
DNA
Straub
DNA
Pedigree
Charts
Census
Records
Every-Name
Indices
Everything I have is online at this web site.  I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case,

please include a link to the page you are referencing.
There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page.

"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go?
The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control again.
Table of Contents
Go to Table of Contents
 
Privacy Policy ______
Every-Name Index
Go to Every-Name Index

¤