Go to Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Diana, Goddess of the Hunt for Ancestors!
 
Go to Every-Name Index
Every-Name Index
Henry CARRICO
Susanna __?__
Husband:  Henry CARRICO
Birth:  ca. 1760s
Death apparently:  1809/10

I've found nothing to document Henry's birthyear as 1773, and the censuses indicate it must have been earlier.

Henry's parents are said to be this couple, but I've found nothing to document the connection:
Father:  Bartholomew "Barton" CARRICO
Mother:  Winifred "Kitty" PADGETT

Marriage:
Wife:  Susanna __?__
Children born in Charles Co., MD, and said to be:
1.  (Son A) CARRICO, b. bef. 1790; d. bef. 1800
2.  (Daughter A) CARRICO, b. bef. 1790; d. bef. 1800
3.  Mary Harriet CARRICO, b. 1790
4.  (Son B) CARRICO, b. 1790-1800
5.  John Stanislaus CARRICO, b. 16 Feb 1794
6.  Cornelius CARRICO, b. 1797/8 
7.  Henry CARRICO, b. ca. 1801; m. 1831, Lucy REED (1805-    )
8.  Perdelia / Delia CARRICO, b. 19 May 1807, Charles Co., MD
Keywords for search engines:  genealogy; USA, US, United States, Maryland

Sources:

1.  Marriage Record

2.  1790 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #7 of 32 list was roughly alphabetized; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤
1790 MD Charles Co. Roll M637_3 p. 13/554 Ln. 4 Henry Callico 2-1-2-0-1
These data indicate:
Gender and Type Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred
2 free white males 16 or over in or bef. 1774 = Henry
= ?
1 free white males 15 or under 1774-1790 = Son A
2 free white females all ages in or bef. 1790 = Susanna
= Daughter A
1 slave all ages in or bef. 1790 = ?
The children here are said not to be Henry's based on Henry's supposed birthyear of 1773, but I have found nothing to document Henry's birthdate, so I see no reason not to assume these are his children.  (The male over age 16 is too old to be his son.)

3.  1800 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #6 of 13; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤
1800 MD Charles Co. Trinity Par. Roll 10 p. 515 Ln. 3 Henry Carricoe 40010-10010-00
These data indicate:
No. & Sex  Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred
4 males 9 or under 1790-1800 = Cornelius (b. 1798)
= John Stanislaus (b. 1794)
= Son B
1 male 26-44 1755-1774 = Henry
1 female 9 or under 1790-1800 = Mary Harriet (b. 1790)
1 female 26-44 1755-1774 = Susanna

4.  Census Index:  U.S. Selected Counties, 1810 (Broderbund CD-313):  Henry CARRICO (or var.) not found, anywhere.

5.  1820 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #38 of 52; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤
1820 KY Washington Co. Roll M33_29 p. 72 Ln. 8 Susan Carrico 121200-02102-0-300 no slaves
These data indicate:
No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred
1 male 9 or under 1810-1820 = ?
2 males 10-15 1804-1810 = ?
= ?
1 male 16-18 1801-1804 = Henry (b. ca. 1801)
1 male 19-25* 1794-1801 = Cornelius (b. 1797/8)
2 females 10-15 1804-1810 = Perdilia (b. 1807)
= ?
1 female 16-25 1794-1804 = Harriet? (b. 1789/90)
2 females 45 or over in or bef. 1775 = Susanna
= ?
3 persons engaged in agriculture
*In the 1820 Census, the third column is age class 16-18 and the fourth column is age class 16-25, which means any individual in column three is duplicated in column four.  So, for an accurate representation of the household, the number in column three should be subtracted from the number in column four. If, after the subtraction, any individuals remain in column four, then they have to be age 19-25, thus creating a "new," more precise age class.
It looks like this may be our subject's widow, but that possibly another widow and her children are living with her.  Or are all the children Susan's?  Harriet, Cornelius, Henry, and Perdilia are not yet married, so should be in the household.

6.  Homer Edwin Carrico.  1981.  "The Carrico Family." Pp. 215-250 in Genealogies of Kentucky Families.  Genealogical Publ. Co., Baltimore, MD (Broderbund CD-185).  [This article is known to contain errors; consult with caution.]  Gives children Stanislaus, Delia, and Harriet, only.

7.  Leo Willett, ed. and compiler; Pearle (Willett) Curtsinger & Rachel Willett, eds.  1988.  A History of St. Jerome, Fancy Farm, Kentucky, 1836-1986.  St. Jerome Parish Community, Fancy Farm, KY (as cited by Linda Boorom, Archives of the CARRICO-DNA mailing list, online at RootsWeb.com):
p. 155-
156
Carrico Family
(1) Cornelius Carrico s/o Henry & Susanna Carrico of Maryland...
p. 157 (Editor's Note: In a letter from William C. Morton, dated Apr 12, 1985, he wrote: "...by organizing and commenting on the known facts I believe that I have presented predominant and ample evidence that Mary Harriett (m. Stanislaus Toon in 1828), Stanislaus, John I. (m. Ann Montgomery in 1817), Cornelius (m. Teresa O'Bryan in 1823), Henry (m. Lucy Reed in 1831), and Perdelia (m. William Toon in 1829) were brothers and sisters to one another."  The parents of these six children were Henry & Susanna Carrico of Charles County, MD. by William C. Morton San Francisco, CA
I'm convinced that Stanislaus and John I. are the same individual (and it's John S., not John I.), which is why Morton found no wife for Stanislaus.  That they were the same man was very obvious from the census records, so you wonder about Morton's credibility.

8.  WorldConnect / Ancestry World Trees (online at RootsWeb.com/Ancestry.com).

9.  Messages posted to the Carrico Family Genealogy Forum (online at GenForum.com).

Contact Home
Page
Table of
Contents
DNA
Hub
Biddle
DNA
Carrico
DNA
Corbin
DNA
Cupp
DNA
Danish
DNA
Ely
DNA
Lyon(s)
DNA
Rasey
DNA
Reason
DNA
Rose
DNA
Straub
DNA
Pedigree
Charts
Census
Records
Every-Name
Indices
Everything I have is online at this web site.  I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case,

please include a link to the page you are referencing.
There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page.

"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go?
The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control again.
Table of Contents
Go to Table of Contents
 
Privacy Policy ______
Every-Name Index
Go to Every-Name Index

¤