Go to Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Diana, Goddess of the Hunt for Ancestors!
 
Go to Every-Name Index
Every-Name Index
John Franklin NASON
Jane MONTGOMERY
Husband:  John Franklin NASON
Birth:  9 Mar 1818, SC
Death:  aft. 1860 census
Occupation:  blacksmith, farmer
Father:  James NASON (1782-1855) of Dublin, IRL
Mother:  Margaret MONTGOMERY (1788-1850s)
Marriage:  13 Dec 1843
Wife:  Jane MONTGOMERY
Birth:  1826, TN
Death:  aft. 1860 census
Occupation:  homemaker
Father:  Hugh MONTGOMERY (1790-1835) of SC
Mother:  Ann / Anne "Annie" Underwood BATTLE (1800-1880) of NC
Children:
born in Pontotoc Co., MS:
1.  Hugh M. NASON, b. 1844/5

born in AL (really?):
2.  Margaret NASON, b. 1848/9, AL; d. bef. 1860

born in Pontotoc Co., MS:
3.  Catherine NASON, b. 1851/2
4.  Burnette E. NASON, b. 1854/5
5.  Richard Thomas NASON, b. Sep 1859

Keywords for search engines:  genealogy; Ireland, Eire, Éire; USA, US, United States, Alabama, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee

Sources:

1.  Marriage Record:

2.  1850 U.S. Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #2 of 306):  Pontotoc Co., MS, Roll M432_380, p. 53B, 12/12, enumerated 27 Aug 1850, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1850 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
John P Nason 32 M   Blacksmith 300 SC
Jane 24 F       Tenn
Hugh  5 M       Missi
Margaret  1 F       Ala
Listed next to Jane's widowed mother, Amy W. (sic) MONTGOMERY (æ 50, b. GA), and two of her siblings, including her sister, Nancy MONTGOMERY (æ 19, b. MS).

3.  1860 U.S. Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #143 of 368):  Birmingham P.O., Pontotoc Co., MS, Roll M653_590, p. 627, PN 143, 935/935, enumerated 25 Jul 1860, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1860 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
Jno F Naxon 42 M   Farmer 4000 2030 SC
Jane M    " 36 F         Tenn
Hugh M    " 15 M         Missi
Catherine "  8 F         "
Burnette E "  5 F         "
Richd T    " 8/12 M         "
Anne Montgomery 56 F         NC
Nancy ?   " 27 F         Missi
Anne is Jane's mother, and Nancy is her sister.

4.  1870 U.S. Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com):  can't find either our subjects or Anne MONTGOMERY.

5.  1880 U.S. Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #45 of 63):  5th Dist., Pontotoc Co., MS, Roll 662, p. 135A, PN 49, SD 1, ED 167, enumerated 21 Jun 1880, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1880 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
1880:  for an explanation of the column headings, please see
What the Numbers in the Federal Census Mean (missing columns contained no data).
1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 24 25 26
407 Owen Joseph P W M 37       /   Farmer MS GA GA
  ____ Julia W F 34   Wife   /   Keeping House MS SC SC
  [Joseph & Julia's children]
  Montgomery A U W F 81         / Keeping House NC NC NC
  __________ E S W F 6/12 Dec GDau         MS MS MS
  Naxon Thos R W M 20   GSon /     Farm laborer MS GA MS
I can't find any obvious genealogical connection between our subjects and Joseph & Julia (BRIGHT) OWEN, so Anne and the children may simply be boarding with them.

6.  1890 U.S. Census:  the 1890 Census Population Schedules were destroyed.

7.  WorldConnect / Ancestry World Trees (online at RootsWeb.com/Ancestry.com).

Contact Home
Page
Table of
Contents
DNA
Hub
Biddle
DNA
Carrico
DNA
Corbin
DNA
Cupp
DNA
Danish
DNA
Ely
DNA
Lyon(s)
DNA
Rasey
DNA
Reason
DNA
Rose
DNA
Straub
DNA
Pedigree
Charts
Census
Records
Every-Name
Indices
Everything I have is online at this web site.  I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case,

please include a link to the page you are referencing.
There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page.

"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go?
The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control.
Table of Contents
Go to Table of Contents
 
Privacy Policy ______
Every-Name Index
Go to Every-Name Index

¤