Table of Contents |
Diana, Goddess
of the Hunt — for Ancestors!
|
Every-Name Index |
Solomon D. HOLDEN
Martha Penelope EULISS Hannah PERDEW |
Husband: Solomon D. HOLDEN
Birth: 1812/3, Wake Co., NC Occupation: farmer Presumed Kin (relationship unknown): Franklin HOLDEN, b. 1823/4, Warren Co., NC Parents: born in NC |
Marriage-1: 16 Oct 1837, Orange Co., NC |
Wife-1: Martha Penelope "Peney / Peny / Pennie" EULIS / EULISS
/ EULESS / EULYSS / EULICE
Birth: 1809/10, Orange [now Alamance] Co., NC There was a large EULISS / EULIS / EULICE family in early Orange [now Alamance] Co., NC, to whom Martha is almost certainly related, but I can't find the connection (see WorldConnect.com). |
Marriage-2: 18 Dec 1867, Guilford Co., NC |
Wife-2: Hannah PERDUE / PERDEW / PURDUE
Birth: Jan 1828, NC Death: aft. 1900 census Occupation: homemaker Father: born in MD or NC Mother: born in NC |
Child with Ms. __?__: |
1. Lorvilla HOLDEN, b. 1834/5, Orange [now
Alamance] Co., NC
Either Lorvilla's age in the census is wrong or she is the child of a prior marriage. |
Children with Penelope EULISS: |
— born in Orange [now Alamance] Co., NC:
2. (Son A) HOLDEN, b. 1835-40 3. William F. HOLDEN, b. 1839/40 — born in Guilford Co., NC:
|
Children with Hannah PERDEW: |
- |
Keywords for search engines: genealogy; USA, US, United States, Maryland, North Carolina |
Sources (n.b., Guilford and Orange
Cos. were adjacent until Alamance Co. was formed in 1849 from Orange Co.,
making Guilford and Alamance Cos. adjacent):
1a. Jordan R. Dodd, ed. 1993. KY, NC, TN, VA, WV Marriages: Early to 1850. Liahona Research, Orem, UT (Broderbund CD-229):
1b. LDS. Family Search: Internet Genealogy Service: IGI - International Genealogical Index (online at FamilySearch.org).
2. 1840 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #137 of 218; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
3. 1850 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #16 of 156): Northern Division, Guilford Co., NC, Roll M432_632, p. 382B, 120/120, enumerated 27 Jul 1850, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1850 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
4. 1860 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #48 of 182): Greensboro P.O., North Division, Guilford Co., NC, Roll M653_900, p. 144B, PN 48, 364/364, enumerated __ Jun 1860, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1860 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
5. 1870 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #10 of 51): Greensboro P.O., Gilmer Twp., Guilford Co., NC, Roll M593_1140, p. 90B, PN 10, 70/70, enumerated 7 Jul 1870, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1870 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
6. 1880 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #2 of 17): Sumner Twp., Guilford Co., NC, Roll T9_965, p. 245B, PN 2, SD 2, ED 120, enumerated 2 Jun 1880, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1880 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
7. 1890 Census: the 1890 Census Population Schedules were destroyed. 8. 1900 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #11 of 23 — indexed "Fan?? Holden"): Sumner Twp., Guilford Co., NC, Roll T623_1198, p. 202A, SN 6, SD 6, ED 70, enumerated 14 Jun 1900, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1900 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
9. WorldConnect / Ancestry World Trees (online at RootsWeb.com/Ancestry.com). |
Contact | Home Page |
Table of Contents |
DNA Hub |
Biddle DNA |
Carrico DNA |
Corbin DNA |
Cupp DNA |
Danish DNA |
Ely DNA |
Lyon(s) DNA |
Rasey DNA |
Reason DNA |
Rose DNA |
Straub DNA |
Pedigree Charts |
Census Records |
Every-Name Indices |
Everything I have is online at this web site. I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case, There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page. |
"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal
on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go? The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control. |
Table of Contents
|
Privacy
Policy ______
|
Every-Name Index
|