Samuel HATCH & Submit WEBSTER

Table of Contents

Diana, Goddess of the Hunt — for Ancestors!

Every-Name Index

Samuel HATCH
Submit WEBSTER

Husband: Samuel HATCH
Birth: 20 May 1765, Lebanon, Windham [now New London] Co., CT
Death: 29 Feb 1816, Herkimer Co., NY
Father: Samuel HATCH (1735- )

Marriage: 25 Mar 1790, Lebanon, Windham [now New London] Co., CT

Wife: Submit WEBSTER
Birth: ca. 5 Apr 1767, Lebanon, Windham [now New London] Co., CT
Death: Oct 1855, Herkimer Co., NY
Father: Josiah WEBSTER (1742/3-1816) — Josiah⁴, John³, Thomas², John¹ WEBSTER (1590-1661), Gov. of Connecticut Colony
Mother: Sarah LOOMIS (1736-c1794) — Joseph⁵, Joseph⁴, Joseph³, Joseph², Joseph¹ LOOMIS (1590-1658), immigrant from England

Children — born in the Town of Columbia, Herkimer Co., NY:

1. (Son A) HATCH, b. 1784-94
2. Tryphena HATCH, b. 7 Jul 1793
3. (Son B) HATCH, b. 1794-1800
4. (Son C) HATCH, b. 1794-1800
5. Hannah HATCH, b. 1797/8; d. 1874, Richfield, Otsego Co., NY; unmarried
6. Jerome L. HATCH, b. 1800/1; m. Permelia KEITH (b. 1806/7, NY)
7. Golden HATCH, b. 3 Feb 1802
8. Abigail HATCH, b. ca. 1804; d. 26 May 1840; m. George EDICK (c1800-1836)

Keywords for search engines: genealogy; USA, US, United States, Connecticut, New York

Sources (n.b., the Town of Lebanon was formed in 1700 in New London Co., then was transferred to Windham Co. in 1726, then was transferred back to New London Co. in 1824; Herkimer Co. was formed in 1791 from Montgomery Co.; the Town of Warren was formed from the Town of German Flatts in 1796; the Town of Columbia was formed from the Town of Warren, apparently between 1810 and 1820; Richfield, Otsego Co., is adjacent to Columbia, Herkimer Co.):

1. Marriage Record:

2. 1790 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com): not found, and I did a page-by-page search of German Flatts, Montgomery Co., NY. There is a Samuel HATCH in Lebanon, CT, but this is not the household of a newlywed (too many people).

3. 1800 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com): not found, and I did a page-by-page search of Warren, Herkimer Co., NY. The Samuel HATCH in Lebanon, CT, is too old to be our subject.

4. 1810 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #6 of 15; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):

1810 NY Herkimer Co. Warren [now Columbia] Roll 27 p. 458 Ln. 24 Samuel [Hatch?] 13110-11110-00

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

1 male 9 or under 1800-1810 = Golden (b. 1802?)

3 males 10-15 1794-1800 = Jerome (b. 1800/1)
= Son C
= Son B

1 male 16-25 1784-1794 = Son A

1 male 26-44 1765-1784 = Samuel (b. 1765)

1 female 9 or under 1800-1810 = Abigail (b. ca. 1804)

1 female 10-15 1794-1800 = Hannah (b. 1797/8)

1 female 16-25 1784-1794 = Tryphena (b. 1793/4)

1 female 26-44 1765-1784 = Submit (b. 1767)

His surname is partially covered by tape in the binding; he is indexed only as "Samuel." Listed next to David V. W. GOLDEN.

5. 1820 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #4 of 9; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):

1820 NY Herkimer Co. Columbia Roll M33_67 p. 56 Ln. 31 Submit Hatch 000200-00111-0-100

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

2 males 19-25* 1794-1801 = Golden (b. 1802?)
= Jerome (b. 1800/1)

1 female 16-25 1794-1804 = Abigail (b. ca. 1804)

1 female 26-44 1775-1794 = Hannah (b. 1797/8)

1 female 45 or over in or bef. 1775 = Submit (b. 1767)

1 person engaged in agriculture

*In the 1820 Census, the third column is age class 16-18 and the fourth column is age class 16-25, which means any individual in column three is duplicated in column four. So, for an accurate representation of the household, the number in column three should be subtracted from the number in column four. If, after the subtraction, any individuals remain in column four, then they have to be age 19-25, thus creating a "new," more precise age class.

Tryphena is married and living with her first husband, Orrin ROSE, in Richfield.

6. 1830 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #9-10 of 26; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):

1830 NY Herkimer Co. Columbia Roll 91 pp. 203A-203B Ln. 13 Submit Hatch 001 001 - 000 000 001 000000-010000

These data indicate:

No., Race, Gender Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

1 white male 10-14 1815-1820 = ?

1 white male 30-39 1790-1800 = Golden? (b. 1802?)

1 white female 60-69 1760-1770 = Submit (b. 1767)

1 female free colored 10-23 1806-1820 = Elizabeth WICKES? (b. 1811/2)

Listed next to son-in-law, Orrin ROSE, and daughter, Tryphena (HATCH) ROSE; Abigail HATCH appears to be living with them.

7. 1840 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #7-8 of 21; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):

1840 NY Herkimer Co. Columbia Roll 290 pp. 124A-124B Ln. 5 Submit Hatch 020 001 - 000 100 100 100 010000-010000 0100000

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

2 white males 5-9 1830-1835 =

1 white male 30-39 1800-1810 = Golden (b. 1802?)

1 white female 15-19 1820-1825 =

1 white female 40-49 1790-1800 = Hannah (b. 1797/8)

1 white female 70-79 1760-1770 = Submit (b. 1767)

1 male free colored 10-23 1816-1830 = George HATCH? (b. 1828/9)

1 female free colored 10-23 1816-1830 = Elizabeth WICKES? (b. 1811/2)

1 persons employed in agriculture

8a. 1850 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #21 of 50): Town of Columbia, Herkimer Co., NY, Roll m432_513, p. 63A, 137/141, enumerated 23 Jul 1850, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1850 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):

Golden Hatch 48 M Farmer 3500 NY

Elizabeth 38 F "

Golden 9/12 M "

Submit 83 F "

Hannah 58 F "

Geo Hatch 21 M M "

Elizabeth Wickes 38 F M "

I wonder if Golden isn't fibbing about his age because he courted and married a younger woman?

8b. 1850 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com): Jerome L. HATCH (æ 49, b. NY) and his wife, Permelia (æ 43, b. NY) are living in the Town of Winfield, Herkimer Co., NY (p. 141A), with their eight children.

9. 1860

10. 1870 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #13 of 46): Richfield P.O., Richfield, Otsego Co., NY, Roll M593_1076, p. 491B, PN 14, 119/125, enumerated 25 Jun 1870, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1870 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):

Corbin Mason 76 M W An Invalid 600 4000 Mass

______ Tryphena 76 F W Keeping house New York

Hatch Hannah 72 F W New York

Rose Almira 50 F W Keeping house New York

Purple Westley 19 M W Farm Laberer New York

11. 1880 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #15 of 17): Village of Richfield, Otsego Co., NY, Roll T9_916, p. 447C, PN 15, SD 5, ED 119, enumerated 10/11 Jun 1880, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1880 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):

1880: for an explanation of the column headings, please see
What the Numbers in the Federal Census Mean (missing columns contained no data).

2 3 4 5 6 8 9 11 13 24 25 26

139 Wicks Bethie W F 60 / Keeping House NY NY NY

Rose Almira A W F 59 Sister / at Home NY NY NY

Corbin Tryphena W F 87 Mother / at Home NY CT CT

Based on all earlier censuses, Tryphena had only one daughter, Almira ROSE. "Bethie WICKS" appears to be the Elizabeth WICKES, who was the free-colored female living with Tryphena's parents in the 1830, 1840, and 1850 censuses.

Contact Home
Page Table of
Contents DNA
Hub Biddle
DNA Carrico
DNA Corbin
DNA Cupp
DNA Danish
DNA Ely
DNA Lyon(s)
DNA Rasey
DNA Reason
DNA Rose
DNA Straub
DNA Pedigree
Charts Census
Records Every-Name
Indices

Everything I have is online at this web site. I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case,
please include a link to the page you are referencing.
There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page.

"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go?
The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control.

Table of Contents

Every-Name Index

†