Go to Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Diana, Goddess of the Hunt for Ancestors!
 
Go to Every-Name Index
Every-Name Index
Abraham ENLOWS
Sarah CORBIN
Note:  I strongly suspect that he is the Abraham ENLOWS who married Mariah GALLOWAY in 1809 in Harford Co., MD.  The evidence is circumstantial, but everything fits.
Husband:  Abraham ENLOW / ENLOWS / INLOES 
Birth:  1780-84, MD
Death: 19 Apr 1853, Clay Co., IN
Occupation:  farmer
Father:  James ENLOW
Mother:  Prudence MARSH
Marriage:  12 Feb 1835, Clermont Co., OH
Wife:  Sarah CORBIN she is not the Sarah ENLOW, wife of Jesse ENLOW, who ended up in Illinois 
Birth:  1790/1, MD
Death:  aft. 1860 census
Other Spouse:  m1. by 1810, James ANDERSON
Occupation:  homemaker
Father:  John CORBIN
Mother:  Mary PEDDICORD
Children:
1.  James ENLOWS, b. 1836/7
Keywords for search engines:  genealogy; USA, US, United States, Indiana, Maryland, Ohio

Sources:

1.  Anon.  1966.  Marriage Index:  Ohio, 1789-1850.  Liahona Research, Orem, UT (Broderbund CD-400):
Enlows, Abraham Anderson, Mrs. Sarah Feb 12, 1835 Clermont Co.
Earlier ANDERSON-CORBIN marriage not found on this CD.

2.  1830 U.S. Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com):  can't find Abraham, at least not in Ohio.  The only likely candidate is an Abraham INLOWS (æ 40-50) in Harford Co., MD.  Can't find Sarah, either, and I did a page-by-page search of Monroe Township.

3.  1840 U.S. Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #9-10 of 22 indexed "Entoull"):  ; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤
1840 OH Clermont Co. Monroe Twp. Roll 384 pp. 203B-204A Ln. 21 Abram Enlows 100 010 010 - 000 000 100 0100000
These data indicate:
No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred
1 male 4 or under 1835-1840 = James (b. 1836/7)
1 male 20-29 1810-1820 = son? stepson?
1 male 50-59 1780-1790 = Abraham
1 female 40-49 1790-1800 = Sarah (b. 1790/1)
1 person employed in agriculture
Both Abraham and Sarah had a son (or sons) born 1810-20 in a prior marriage, so the young male could belong to either of them or neither (their prior children were old enough to have married and left the nest).  What's astonishing is that Sarah, at her age, had a child with Abraham.

4.  1850 U.S. Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #6 of 45):  Washington Twp., Clay Co., IN, Roll M432_138, p. 223A, 31/31, enumerated 19 Sep 1850, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1850 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤
Abraham Enlows 69 M   Farmer 700 Maryland
Sarah Enlows 60 F       "
James Enlows 13 M       Ohio

5.  1860 U.S. Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com; Image #22 of 49):  New Richmond P.O., Monroe Twp., Clermont Co., OH, Roll 945, p. 432B/862, PN 22, 166/161, enumerated 11 Jun 1860, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1860 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤
John Corbin 52 M   Farmer 9560 1134 Ohio
Eliz. J. " 50 F   Domestic duties     "
D. B.    " 20 M   Farm Laborer     "
N. J.    " 15 M   Farm Laborer     "
Anne E Fisher 18 F   Domestic duties     "
Sarah Enlow 69 F   Living on her Means     Maryland
John CORBIN is Sarah's first cousin.

6.  1870 U.S. Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com):  not found.

7.  Public Member Trees (online at Ancestry.com).

Contact Home
Page
Table of
Contents
DNA
Hub
Biddle
DNA
Carrico
DNA
Corbin
DNA
Cupp
DNA
Danish
DNA
Ely
DNA
Lyon(s)
DNA
Rasey
DNA
Reason
DNA
Rose
DNA
Straub
DNA
Pedigree
Charts
Census
Records
Every-Name
Indices
Everything I have is online at this web site.  I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case,

please include a link to the page you are referencing.
There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page.

"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go?
The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control.
Table of Contents
Go to Table of Contents
 
Privacy Policy ______
Every-Name Index
Go to Every-Name Index

¤