John CORBIN, Sr. & Mary PEDDICORD

Table of Contents

Diana, Goddess of the Hunt — for Ancestors!

Every-Name Index

John CORBIN, Sr.
Mary PEDDICORD

Husband: John CORBIN, Sr.
Birth: 31 Mar 1760, Baltimore [now Harford?] Co., MD
Death: 31 Jul 1852, Clermont Co., OH
Father: Nathan CORBIN, Sr.
Mother: Sarah JAMES

Marriage: ca. 1783

Wife: Mary PEDDICORD
Birth: 30 May 1763
Death: 30 May 1838, Clermont Co., OH

Children — born in Harford Co., MD:

1. Nicholas CORBIN, b. 12 Jun 1784
2. (Son A) CORBIN, b. bef. 1790
3. (Daughter A) CORBIN, b. bef. 1790
4. (Daughter B) CORBIN, b. bef. 1790
5. Sarah CORBIN, b. 1790/1
6. Elizabeth CORBIN, b. 1800
7. Shadrach CORBIN, b. 2 May 1797
8. John CORBIN, Jr., b. 1790-1800
9. Abraham C. CORBIN, b. 6 Apr 1800
10? (Daughter C) CORBIN, b. 1810-20 — probably not a daughter

Said to have had these children —
. Nathan CORBIN, b. ca. 1793; m. Mary ANDERSON — not the Nathan CORBIN (b. 1776) who married Sarah ENLOWS
. Lydia CORBIN
. James CORBIN, b. ca. 1835 — impossible, Mary was too old to have a child in 1835

It's a stretch for Mary to have had a child in 1810 (Daughter C), but it's possible. On the other hand, the ten-or-more-year gap between Abraham and Daughter C argues against her being their daughter.

Keywords for search engines: genealogy; USA, US, United States, Maryland, Ohio

Sources (n.b., Harford Co., was formed from Baltimore Co. in 1773):

1. Marriage Record:

2. 1790 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com; Image #5 of 46; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

1790 MD Harford Co. Roll 3 (Book 1) p. 74 Ln 3 John Corbin 1-2-3-0-0

These data indicate:

Gender and Type Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

1 free white males 16 or over in or bef. 1774 = John (b. 1760)

2 free white males 15 or under 1774-1790 = Nicholas (b. 1784)
= Son A

3 free white females all ages in or bef. 1790 = Mary (b. 1763)
= Daughter A
= Daughter B

Also in Harford County: Thomas CORBIN and Jacob CORBIN.

2. 1800 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com; Image #12 of 16; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

1800 MD Harford Co. District 3 Roll 11 p. 78 Ln 10 John Corbin 31010-20010-00

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

3 males 9 or under 1790-1800 = Abraham (b. 1800)
= John (b. ca. 1799)
= Shadrach (b. 1797)

1 male 10-15 1784-1790 = Nicholas (b. 1784)

1 male 26-44 1755-1774 = John (b. 1760)

2 females 9 or under 1790-1800 = Elizabeth (b. 1800)
= Sarah (b. 1790/1)

1 female 26-44 1755-1774 = Mary (b. 1763)

Also in Harford County: John's father, Nathan CORBIN, Sr.

3a. Census Index: U.S. Selected Counties, 1810 (Broderbund CD-313): not found, but the 1810 Ohio census was lost (except for Washington County). Some tax lists are substituted, including ones from Clermont County, but there are no CORBINs in Ohio on this CD.

3b. Clermont County Ohio — 1810 Tax List Index (online at the Clermont County OHGenWeb site; contributed by Hope Freeman Carnicle): there are no CORBINs on this list.

4. 1820 Census Index and Digital Images (online at Ancestry.com; Image #2 of 12; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

1820 OH Clermont Co. Ohio Twp. p. 29/57 Ln. 01 John Corbin 000301-10101-0-103

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

3 males 19-25* 1794-1801 = Abraham (b. 1800)
= John (b. ca. 1799)
= Shadrach (b. 1797)

1 male 45 or over in or bef. 1775 = John (b. 1760)

1 female 9 or under 1810-1820 = Daughter E

1 female 16-25 1794-1804 = Daughter D

1 female 45 or over in or bef. 1775 = Mary (b. 1763)

1 person engaged in agriculture

3 persons engaged in manufacture

*In the 1820 Census, the third column is age class 16-18 and the fourth column is age class 16-25; therefore, any individual in column three is duplicated in column four. By subtracting the number in column three from the number in column four, you can create an age class "19-25."

Listed four lines below John's widowed mother, Sarah (JAMES) CORBIN, and one line above Sarah ANDERSON.

5. 1830 Census Index and Digital Images (online at Ancestry.com; Image #15 of 20; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):•

1830 OH Clermont Co. Monroe Twp. p. 235 Ln. 19 John Corbin 002 000 001 - 000 001 001

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

2 males 10-14 1815-1820 = ?
= ?

1 male 60-69 1760-1770 = John (b. 1760)

1 female 30-39 1790-1800 = Daughter D

1 female 60-69 1760-1770 = Mary (b. 1763)

The two males born 1815-20 were not with our subjects in earlier censuses, so they cannot be their children. They could be grandchildren or hired help, and certainly at their ages, they needed the help.

6. 1840 — can't find, but surely he is living with one of his children.

7. 1850 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com; Image #12 of 46): Monroe Twp., Clermont Co., OH, p. 6B, 84/84, enumerated 7 Oct 1850, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1850 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):•

Abraham C Corbin 50 M Farmer 2625 Md

[Abraham's wife and children]

John Corbin 90 M Farmer Md

Charles Foolks 12 M Ohio

Listed three households from John's grandson, Shadrach CORBIN (son of Nicholas).

8. LDS. Family Search: Internet Genealogy Service: AF - Ancestral File (online at FamilySearch.org).

9. WorldConnect / Ancestry World Trees (online at RootsWeb.com/Ancestry.com).

Contact Home
Page Table of
Contents DNA
Hub Biddle
DNA Carrico
DNA Corbin
DNA Cupp
DNA Danish
DNA Ely
DNA Lyon(s)
DNA Rasey
DNA Reason
DNA Rose
DNA Straub
DNA Pedigree
Charts Census
Records Every-Name
Indices

Everything I have is online at this web site. I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case,
please include a link to the page you are referencing.
There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page.

"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go?
The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control.

Table of Contents

Every-Name Index