Table of Contents |
Diana, Goddess
of the Hunt — for Ancestors!
|
Every-Name Index |
Seneca CORBIN
Hannah YOUNG Hannah INGRAHAM |
Husband: Seneca CORBIN
Birth: May 1809, Addison Co., VT Death: 15 Oct 1880, Amboy Twp., Fulton Co., OH Occupation: farmer Father: David Elwood CORBIN Mother: Sarah KNOWLES |
Marriage-1: ca. 1832 |
Wife-1 said to be: Hannah YOUNG
Birth: 1810-20 Death: 1845-49 Occupation: homemaker |
Marriage-2: 21 Oct 1849, Monroe Co., MI |
Wife-2: Hannah INGRAHAM
Birth: 1812/3, NY Occupation: homemaker |
Children with Hannah YOUNG: |
1. Sarah CORBIN, b. 1833/4, NY
2. Hannah CORBIN, b. 1835/6, OH 3. Eunice CORBIN, b. May 1840, OH 4. Mary CORBIN, b. 1843/4, OH 5. James CORBIN, b. 1845/6, OH |
Children with Hannah INGRAHAM: |
6. Clinton
Melvin CORBIN, b. 1850/1
7. David Elwood CORBIN, b. 6 Nov 1853, Delta, Fulton Co., OH 8. [Alvah] Alva "Elvy" CORBIN, b. 1855/6 [Alvah is a biblical name; Alva is an Anglicized variation; Elvy is a nickname.] |
Keywords for search engines: genealogy; USA, US, United States, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Vermont |
Sources (n.b., Fulton Co. was formed in 1850 from Lucas, Henry,
and Williams Cos.; Lucas Co. and Fulton Co. are adjacent; Monroe Co., MI,
is adjacent to Lucas Co., OH; Lenawee Co., MI, is adjacent to Fulton Co.,
OH):
1. Jordan R. Dodd. Marriage Index: Michigan and Wisconsin, 1830-1900. Liahona Research, Orem, UT (Broderbund CD-251):
. 1830 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #X; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
. 1840 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #6 of 6 of the Royalton images plus 1 of 5 of the Amboy images — the number pages precede the name pages and Ancestry mis-grouped them; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•
. 1850 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #4 of 11): Amboy Twp., Fulton Co., OH, Roll M432_681, p. 289B, 290/291, enumerated 8 Aug 1850, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1850 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•
. 1860 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #4 of 4 in Matamora plus 9 of 23 in Amboy): Matamora P.O., Amboy Twp., Fulton Co., OH, Roll M653_965, pp. 431B-432A/786-787, PN 142-143, 1080/1025, enumerated 25 Jul 1860, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1860 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•
. 1870 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #18 of 28): Metamora P.O., Amboy Twp., Fulton Co., OH, Roll M593_1202, p. 9B, PN 18, 141/136, enumerated 16 Jul 1870, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1870 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•
. 1880 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #21 of 24): Amboy Twp., Fulton Co., OH, Roll T9_1017, p. 55A, PN 21, SD 1, ED 17, enumerated 21 Jun 1880, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1880 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•
. Thomas Mikesell, ed. 1905. The County of Fulton: A History of Fulton County, Ohio, from the Earliest Days... Northwest Historical Assn., Madison, WI (Broderbund CD-450). On p. 189:
. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. The Official Land Patent Records Office.
. Archives of the CORBIN-L mailing list (online at RootsWeb.com). . Messages in the Corbin Family Genealogy Forum (online at GenForum.com). . Email from Merri Kelly. |
Contact | Home Page |
Table of Contents |
DNA Hub |
Biddle DNA |
Carrico DNA |
Corbin DNA |
Cupp DNA |
Danish DNA |
Ely DNA |
Lyon(s) DNA |
Rasey DNA |
Reason DNA |
Rose DNA |
Straub DNA |
Pedigree Charts |
Census Records |
Every-Name Indices |
Everything I have is online at this web site. I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case, There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page. |
"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal
on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go? The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control. |
Table of Contents
|
Privacy
Policy ______
|
Every-Name Index
|