Go to Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Diana, Goddess of the Hunt — for Ancestors!
 
Go to Every-Name Index
Every-Name Index
Robert Nalle BODINE
Grace GALLAGHER
Husband:  Robert Nalle BODINE
Birth:  1790-1800, Nelson Co., KY
Death:  1831/2, Clark Co., KY
Father:  John BODINE (c1772-1815)
Mother:  Catherine PARKER (1776-1843)
Marriage:  22 Jun 1828, Clark Co., IL
Wife:  Grace GALLAGHAR / GALLAGHER
Birth:  1791, Mercer Co., KY
Death:  12 Dec 1867, Clark Co., IL
Other Spouse:  m1. 29 Jun 1807, Mercer Co., KY, Nathaniel McCLURE
Other Spouse:  m2. 11 Apr 1825, Clark Co., IL, William Plunkett BENNETT
Other Spouse:  m4. 16 Oct 1836, Clark Co., IL, Hugh MALONE
Father:  Charles GALLAGHER
Mother:  Nancy BUNTON
Child — born in Clark Co., IL:
1.  William BODINE, b. 1830
Keywords for search engines:  genealogy; USA, US, United States, Illinois, Kentucky

Sources:

1.  Jordan R. Dodd, ed.  1993.  Illinois Marriages:  Early to 1850.  Liahona Research, Orem, UT (Broderbund CD-228):
Bodine, Robert N. Bennett, Grace Jun 22, 1828 Clark Co.

2.  1830 U.S. Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #7 of 50; official enumeration date 1 Jun 1830; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
1830 IL Clark Co. Roll M19_23 p. 54 Ln. 18 Robert N Bodine 101 012 - 010 001
These data indicate:
No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred
1 male 4 or under 1825-1830 = William (b. 1830/1)
1 male 10-14 1815-1820 = Charles McCLURE (b. 1819/20)
1 male 20-29 1800-1810 = ?
2 males 30-39 1790-1800 = Robert
= ?
1 female 5-9 1820-1825 = ?
1 female 30-39 1790-1800 = Grace (b. 1791) 

3.  1840 U.S. Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #3 of 177); official enumeration began 1 Jun 1840; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
1840 IL Clark Co. Roll 56 pp. 68 Ln. 9 Malone H 02/3?/ 510 200 - 0/2?/0 010 100 total 15 _______
These data indicate:
No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred
2 males 5-9 1830-1835 = Newton MALONE (b. 1831/2)
= William BODINE (b. 1830/1)
? males 10-14 1825-1830 = Male BENNETT? (b. 1825-28)?
5 males 15-19 1820-1825 = Son
= Son
= ? ? ?
1 male 20-29 1810-1820 = Charles McCLURE (b. 1819/20) 
2 males 40-49 1790-1800 = Hugh MALONE (b. 1798/9)
? females 5-9 1830-1835 = Mary McCLURE (b. 1830/1)
1 female 20-29 1810-1820 = ?
1 female 40-49 1790-1800 = Grace (GALLAGHER) MALONE (b. 1790/1) 
The page is full of blots and smudges — and roughly alphabetized, but very oddly.

4.  1850 U.S. Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #7 of 33):  Darwin Pct., Dist. No. 48, Clark Co., IL, Roll M432_100, p. 222A, 795/795, enumerated 20 Sep 1850, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1850 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
Hugh Malone 51 M   Farmer 1400 Alabamer?
Grace   " 59 F       Kentucky
Newton  " 18 M       Illinois
Charles McClure 30 M   Brick Mason   Kentucky
William Bodine 19 M      400 Illinois
Mary McClure 19 F       "
Enoch G Boston 30 M   Farmer   Ohio
Kesiah Stuart  9 F B     Illinois
Mary was born too late (1830/1) to be Grace's daughter by Nathaniel McCLURE.

5.  Public Member Trees (online at Ancestry.com).

6.  WorldConnect / Ancestry World Trees (online at RootsWeb.com/Ancestry.com).

Contact Home
Page
Table of
Contents
DNA
Hub
Biddle
DNA
Carrico
DNA
Corbin
DNA
Cupp
DNA
Danish
DNA
Ely
DNA
Lyon(s)
DNA
Rasey
DNA
Reason
DNA
Rose
DNA
Straub
DNA
Pedigree
Charts
Census
Records
Every-Name
Indices
Everything I have is online at this web site.  I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case,

please include a link to the page you are referencing.
There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page.

"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go?
The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control.
Table of Contents
Go to Table of Contents
 
Privacy Policy ______
Every-Name Index
Go to Every-Name Index

¤