Go to Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Diana, Goddess of the Hunt — for Ancestors!
 
Go to Every-Name Index
Every-Name Index
James ROSE
Winifred SANDY
Husband:  James ROSE
Birth:  1765-75
Marriage:  11 Jul 1798, Richmond Co., VA
Wife:  Winifred / Winnefred "Winnie / Winney" SANDY
Birth:  1765-75
Father:  Mason SANDY
Mother:  Elizabeth __?__
Children — born in Richmond Co., VA:
1.  (Son A) ROSE, b. 1800-01
2.  (Daughter A) ROSE, b. 1800-04
3.  (Daughter B) ROSE, b. 1810-20
Keywords for search engines:  genealogy; USA, US, United States, Virginia

Sources (n.b., Westmoreland Co., VA, is adjacent to Richmond Co.):

1a.  Jordan Dodd.  Virginia Marriages to 1800 (online at Ancestry.com):
Rose, James Sandy, Winney 11 Jul 1798 Richmond Co.

1b.  Robert K. Headley, Jr..  c2003.  Married Well and Often: Marriages of the Northern Neck of Virginia, 1649-1800: Marriages and Marriage references for the Counties of Lancaster, Northumberland, Old Rappahannock, Richmond, and Westmoreland.  Genealogical Publ. Co., Baltimore, MD (online at Ancestry.com):
p. 303 ROSE, James & SANDY, Winney; b. 11 Jul 1798; Mason SANDY (sec.); Mason & Eliz. SANDY (nfi) gave their dons.; (MLB RC)

2.  1800 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com):  the entire 1800 VA census was lost.

3.  1810 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #21 of 28; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•
1810 VA Richmond Co. Roll 70 p. 345/406 Ln. 16 James Rose 10010-10010-01
These data indicate:
No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred
1 male 9 or under 1800-1810 = Son A
1 male 26-44 1765-1784 = James
1 female 9 or under 1800-1810 = Daughter A
1 female 26-44 1765-1784 = Winifred
1 slaves all ages by 1810 = ?
Listed two lines below John SANDY, who is one line below Winnie's sister, Nancy SANDY.  I don't know who John SANDY is. 

4.  1820 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #12 of 15 — list was roughly alphabetized; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤
1820 VA Westmoreland Co. Roll M33_135 p. 293 Ln. 13 Rose James 000101-10101-0-200 no slaves
These data indicate:
No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred
1 male 19-25* 1794-1801 = Son A
1 male 45 or over in or bef. 1775 = James
1 female 9 or under 1810-1820 = Daughter B
1 female 16-25 1794-1804 = Daughter A
1 female 45 or over in or bef. 1775 = Winifred
2 persons engaged in agriculture
*In the 1820 Census, the third column is age class 16-18 and the fourth column is age class 16-25, which means any individual in column three is duplicated in column four.  So, for an accurate representation of the household, the number in column three should be subtracted from the number in column four. If, after the subtraction, any individuals remain in column four, then they have to be age 19-25, thus creating a "new," more precise age class.
Also in Westmoreland County:  Bennett ROSE, Joel S. ROSE, and Margaret ROSE.
 

Public Member Trees (online at Ancestry.com).

WorldConnect / Ancestry World Trees (online at RootsWeb.com/Ancestry.com). 
A file there includes this note:
Page 56; 2 July 1832
Last Will and Testament of Mason Sandy decd. Contested by James Rose
and Winnefred his wife, who was Winnefred Sandy, daughter of said Mason.
John Sandy exor. Will accepted for probate.

Contact Home
Page
Table of
Contents
DNA
Hub
Biddle
DNA
Carrico
DNA
Corbin
DNA
Cupp
DNA
Danish
DNA
Ely
DNA
Lyon(s)
DNA
Rasey
DNA
Reason
DNA
Rose
DNA
Straub
DNA
Pedigree
Charts
Census
Records
Every-Name
Indices
Everything I have is online at this web site.  I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case,

please include a link to the page you are referencing.
There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page.

"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go?
The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control.
Table of Contents
Go to Table of Contents
 
Privacy Policy ______
Every-Name Index
Go to Every-Name Index