Aaron ROBERSON & Jane DERMOND

Table of Contents

Diana, Goddess of the Hunt — for Ancestors!

Every-Name Index

Aaron ROBERSON
Jane DERMOND

Husband: Aaron ROBERTSON / ROBERSON
Birth: 1762/3, NC
Occupation: farmer

Marriage:

Wife: Jane DERMOND
Birth: 1770/1, NC
Occupation: homemaker
Father: James DEARMOND (1753-1830)
Mother: Elizabeth REID (1756- )

Children:

1. Mary ROBERSON / ROBINSON, b. 1813/4, Macon Co., NC; m. 7 Dec 1832, Macon Co., NC, John MASON (1812-1867)

Keywords for search engines: genealogy; USA, US, United States, North Carolina

Sources (n.b., Forsyth and Cherokee Cos. in GA are adjacent):

1. Jordan R. Dodd, ed. 1993. North Carolina Marriages: Early to 1850. Liahona Research, Orem, UT (Broderbund CD-229):

Roberson, Aaron Dermond, Jane 6 Jun 1803 Mecklenburg Co.

These may or may not be our subjects, but if they are, it's almost certainly not the first marriage for either of them.

2. 1810 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com; Image #3 of 5; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):

1810 NC Mecklenburg Co. Capt. Porter's Company Roll M252_42 p. 466 Ln. 25 Aron Robeson 00010-20010-00

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

1 male 26-44 1765-1784 =

0 male 45 or over in or bef. 1765 =

2 females 9 or under 1800-1810 =

1 female 26-44 1765-1784 =

4. 1830 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com; Image #15 of 62; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):

1830 NC Macon Co. Roll M19_123 p. 10 Ln. 13 Aaron Robertson 001 100 001 - 011 020 010 no slaves

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

1 male 10-14 1815-1820 =

1 male 15-19 1810-1815 =

1 male 60-69 1760-1770 = Aaron (b. 1762/3)

1 female 5-9 1820-1825 = Daughter

1 female 10-14 1815-1820 = Mary (b. 1813/4)

2 females 20-29 1800-1810 = Daughter
= Daughter

1 female 50-59 1770-1780 = Jane (b. 1770/1)

5. 1840 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #3-4 of 4; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):

1840 GA Cherokee Co. District 960 Roll M704_38 pp. 193B-194A Ln. 4 Aaron Roberson 110 100 000 100 - 210 101 001 0200000 no slaves

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

1 male 4 or under 1835-1840 = John JAMES (b. 1836/7)

1 male 5-9 1830-1835 = William (b. 1834/5)

1 male 15-19 1820-1825 = ?

1 male 70-79 1760-1770 = Aaron (b. 1762/3)

2 females 4 or under 1835-1840 = Harriet JAMES (b. 1838/9)
= Selinia JAMES (b. 1838/9)

1 female 5-9 1830-1835 = Martha JAMES (b. 1831/2)

1 female 15-19 1820-1825 = ?

1 female 30-39 1800-1810 = ?

1 female 60-69 1770-1780 = Jane (b. 1770/1)

2 person employed in agriculture

6. 1850 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com; Image #131 of 190): Thirty-First District, Forsyth Co., GA, Roll M432_69, p. 210A, 910/910, enumerated 11 Oct 1850, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1850 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):

Aaron Robertson 87 M Farmer 150 NC

Jane " 79 F "

Martha J James 18 F "

William B " 15 M Farmer "

John A " 13 M "

Salenia E " 11 F "

Harriet L " 11 F "

Are the JAMES children their grandchildren?

7. LDS. Family Search: Internet Genealogy Service: Pedigree Resource File (index to CDs, online at FamilySearch.org).

Contact Home
Page Table of
Contents DNA
Hub Biddle
DNA Carrico
DNA Corbin
DNA Cupp
DNA Danish
DNA Ely
DNA Lyon(s)
DNA Rasey
DNA Reason
DNA Rose
DNA Straub
DNA Pedigree
Charts Census
Records Every-Name
Indices

Everything I have is online at this web site. I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case,
please include a link to the page you are referencing.
There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page.

"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go?
The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control.

Table of Contents

Every-Name Index