William MONTGOMERY & Frances MILLER

Table of Contents

Diana, Goddess of the Hunt — for Ancestors!

Every-Name Index

William MONTGOMERY
Frances MILLER

Husband: William MONTGOMERY
Birth: ca. 1778
Father: Col. John MONTGOMERY
Mother: Phoebe RAMSEY

Marriage: 23 Nov 1802, Montgomery Co., TN

Wife: Frances "Fanny" MILLER
Birth: ca. 1783
Occupation: homemaker

Children:

— presumably born in Montgomery Co., TN
1. (Son A) MONTGOMERY, b. 1803/4
2. (Son B) MONTGOMERY, b. 1804-10
3. (Son C) MONTGOMERY, b. 1804-10

— presumably born in Montogmery Co., TN, or Livingston Co., KY:
4. (Son D) MONTGOMERY, b. 1810-20
5. (Son E) MONTGOMERY, b. 1810-20
6. (Son F) MONTGOMERY, b. 1810-20
7. (Daughter A) MONTGOMERY, b. 1810-20

Keywords for search engines: genealogy; USA, US, United States, Kentucky, Tennessee

Sources:

1. Jordan R. Dodd, ed. 1993. Tennessee Marriages: Early to 1850. Liahona Research, Orem, UT (Broderbund CD-229):

Montgomery, William Miller, Fanny 23 Nov 1802 Montgomery Co.

2. 1810 U.S. Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com): the Tennessee census was lost; not found in Livingston, Christian, or Logan Co., KY.

3. 1820 U.S. Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #3 of 13; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):

1820 KY Livingston Co. Salem Roll M33_26 p. 4 Ln. 2 Will Montgomery 321110-10010-0-200 3000-3100

These data indicate:

No., Race, Gender Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

3 white males 9 or under 1810-1820 = Son F
= Son E
= Son D

2 white males 10-15 1804-1810 = Son C
= Son B

1 white male 16-18 1801-1804 = Son A

1 white male 19-25* 1794-1801 =

1 white male 26-44 1775-1794 = William (b. ca. 1778)

1 white female 9 or under 1810-1820 = Daughter A

1 white female 26-44 1775-1794 = Fanny (b. ca. 1783)

2 people engaged in agriculture

3 male slaves 13 and under 1806-1820 = ? ? ?

3 female slaves 13 and under 1806-1820 = ? ? ?

1 female slave 14-25 1794-1806 = ?

*In the 1820 Census, the third column is age class 16-18 and the fourth column is age class 16-25, which means any individual in column three is duplicated in column four. So, for an accurate representation of the household, the number in column three should be subtracted from the number in column four.

Listed one line below Davis FORT.

Contact Home
Page Table of
Contents DNA
Hub Biddle
DNA Carrico
DNA Corbin
DNA Cupp
DNA Danish
DNA Ely
DNA Lyon(s)
DNA Rasey
DNA Reason
DNA Rose
DNA Straub
DNA Pedigree
Charts Census
Records Every-Name
Indices

Everything I have is online at this web site. I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case,
please include a link to the page you are referencing.
There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page.

"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go?
The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control.

Table of Contents

Every-Name Index

†