Clement MATTINGLY / MATNEY & Sarah BREWER

Table of Contents

Diana, Goddess of the Hunt — for Ancestors!

Every-Name Index

Clement MATTINGLY / MATNEY
Sarah BREWER

Husband: Clement MATTINGLY / MATNEY
Birth: 14 Feb 1739/40, St. Marys Co., MD
Death: 23 Jan 1838, Brown Co., IN
Disposition: buried Mt. Zion Cemetery, Brown Co., IN

Given the age difference between Clement and Sarah, surely he had an earlier wife.

Marriage: 22 Apr 1790, Nelson Co., KY

Wife: Sarah BREWER
Birth: 1750-60
Other Spouse: m1. David ALLEN

Children:

— born in Nelson [now Washington] Co., KY:
1. Thomas MATTINGLY / MATNEY, b. ca. 1790; d. 1850, Fulton Co., IL
2. (Daughter A) MATTINGLY / MATNEY, b. 1790-94
3. Henry Calvin MATTINGLY / MATNEY, b. ca. 1791; d. 1869

— born in Washington Co., KY:
4. Elias B. MATTINGLY / MATNEY, b. 2 Apr 1792; d. 9 Oct 1874, Rush Co., IN
5. Uriah MATTINGLY / MATNEY, b. ca. 1793
6. Stephen MATTINGLY / MATNEY, b. 1794/5
7. Catherine MATTINGLY / MATNEY, b. ca. 1797

Keywords for search engines: genealogy; USA, US, United States, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland

Sources (n.b., Washington Co. was formed in 1792 from Nelson Co.):

1. Jordan R. Dodd, ed. 1993. Kentucky Marriages: Early to 1850. Liahona Research, Orem, UT (Broderbund CD-229):

Mattingly, Clement Allen, Sarah 22 Apr 1790 Nelson Co.

2. 1790 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com): Clement not found, but the Virginia census was lost (Kentucky was not formed from Virginia until 1792).

3. Anon. 1995. Nelson County Kentucky Taxpayers, 1793-1799. T.L.C. Genealogy, Miami Beach, FL: Clement not found, which is consistent with him actually being in Washington County.

4. Anon. 1991. The 1795 Census of Kentucky [as constructed from tax lists]. T.L.C. Genealogy, Miami Beach, FL (said to include every extant tax list from every county existing in the state of Kentucky in 1795):

Pg Name County

110 Mattingley, Clement Washington

5. 1800 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com): Clement not found, but the 1800 census of Kentucky was lost.

6. 1810 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #4 of 57 — indexed "Chmert"; list roughly alphabetic; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):

1810 KY Washington Co. Roll 8 p. 289/908 Ln. 12 Clement Mattingly 01201-01101-00

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

1 male 10-15 1794-1800 = Stephen (b. 1794/5)

2 males 16-25 1784-1794 = Uriah (b. ca. 1793)
= Elias (b. 1792)

1 male 45 or over by 1765 = Clement (b. 1739/40)

1 female 10-15 1794-1800 = Catherine (b. ca. 1797)

1 female 16-25 1784-1794 = Daughter A (b. 1790-94)

1 female 45 or over by 1765 = Sarah

Sarah would have been hard pressed to have had three children in four years (1790-94), but I suppose it's possible.

7. 1820 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com): can't find, which suggests they're in Indiana.

8. 1830 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #99-100 of 136; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):

1830 IN Orange Co. Roll 31 p. 209 Ln. 20 Clement Matney 011 000 000 001 - 010 001 000 100 no slaves

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

1 male 5-9 1820-1825 = grandson?

1 male 10-14 1815-1820 = grandson?

1 male 90-99 1730-1740 = Clement (b. 1739/40)

1 female 5-9 1820-1825 = granddaughter?

1 female 30-39 1790-1800 = daughter? / daughter-in-law?

1 female 70-79 1750-1760 = Sarah

9. WorldConnect / Ancestry World Trees (online at RootsWeb.com/Ancestry.com).

Contact Home
Page Table of
Contents DNA
Hub Biddle
DNA Carrico
DNA Corbin
DNA Cupp
DNA Danish
DNA Ely
DNA Lyon(s)
DNA Rasey
DNA Reason
DNA Rose
DNA Straub
DNA Pedigree
Charts Census
Records Every-Name
Indices

Everything I have is online at this web site. I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case,
please include a link to the page you are referencing.
There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page.

"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go?
The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control.

Table of Contents

Every-Name Index