Go to Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Diana, Goddess of the Hunt for Ancestors!
 
Go to Every-Name Index
Every-Name Index
Joseph LOCKLIER
Sarah __?__
Husband:  Joseph LOCKELIER / LOCKLIER / LOCKLEAR
Birth:  1808/9, GA
Occupation:  farmer
Father:  Mr. LOCKLIER
Mother almost certainly:  Grace __?__, b. 1776/7, SC
Marriage:
Migration:  1835-38, GA to FL
Wife:  Sarah __?__
Birth:  1810, GA
Occupation:  homemaker
Children:
born in GA:
1.  (Daughter A) LOCKLIER, b. 1830-35
2.  Caroline LOCKLIER, b. 1835

born in FL, either in Columbia Co., FL, or Madison Co., FL:
3.  Nancy LOCKLIER, b. 1837/8
4.  Mary LOCKLIER, b. 1842/3
5.  William LOCKLIER, b. 1844/5

Other Kin:
.  Daniel SISTRUNK / SESTRUNK, b. 1779/80, SC; d. 1850-60, Madison Co., FL
.  Mrs. Grace (__?__) LOCKLIER, b. 1776/7, SC; d. aft. 1860, probably in Madison Co., FL
.  Mary LOCKLIER, b. 1840/1, FL
Keywords for search engines:  genealogy; USA, US, United States, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina

Sources:

1.  Marriage Record:

2.  1840 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #19-20 of 20; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
1840 FT Columbia Co. Roll 36 pp. 157B-158A Ln. 29 Joseph Lockelear 000 001 - 210 001 0100000
These data indicate:
No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred
1 male 30-39 1800-1810 = Joseph (b. 1808/9)
2 females 4 or under 1835-1840 = Nancy (b. 1837/8)
= Caroline (b. 1835)
1 female 5-9 1830-1835 = Daughter A
1 female 30-39 1800-1810 = Sarah (b. 1810)
1 person employed in agriculture
Listed one line below Gracy LOCKELEAR (020 - 110 010 010), who is almost certainly Joseph's widowed mother.

3.  1850 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #8 of 67):  11th Division, Madison Co., FL, Roll M432_59, p. 86B, 53/53, enumerated 18 Oct 1850, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1850 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
Joseph Locklier 42 M   Farmer   Ga
Sarah Locklier 41 F       "
Caroline Locklier 15 F       "
Nancy Locklier 12 F       Fla
Mary Locklier  7 F       "
William Locklier  5 M       "
James Boothe 50 M   laborer   SC
Listed next to Daniel SISTRUNK (æ 70, b. SC) and his wife, Grace [the former widow Grace (__?__) LOCKIER] (æ 73, b. SC) and family, with whom Mary LOCKLIER (æ 9, b. FL) is living. 

4.  1860 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #3 of 3 indexed "Lacklier"):  New Boston P.O., Township 7, Range 14, Lafayette Co., FL, Roll M653_107, p. 960, PN 10, 66/61, enumerated 14 Jun 1860, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1860 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
Joseph Lockelier 51 M   Farmer 640 740 Georgia
Sarah      " 49 F         Do
Caroline   " 24 F   Domestic     Florida
Mary J     " 19 F   "     Do
Margeanna  " 17 F   "     Do
William H  " 14 M         Do
Gracy Sestrunk 83 F         S Carolina
Joseph Parker 17 M   Farm laborer     Florida
James Corban 21 M   Farm laborer     Do
Josiah Jones 24 M   Farm laborer   120 Georgia
Josiah   "   Jr.  1 M         Florida
In 1874, James CORBIN is said to have married Quaine LOCKLIER, who is almost certainly related to these LOCKLIERs, but how?  I can't find her in any census, so was her given name really "Quaine."

5.  WorldConnect / Ancestry World Trees (online at RootsWeb.com/Ancestry.com).

Contact Home
Page
Table of
Contents
DNA
Hub
Biddle
DNA
Carrico
DNA
Corbin
DNA
Cupp
DNA
Danish
DNA
Ely
DNA
Lyon(s)
DNA
Rasey
DNA
Reason
DNA
Rose
DNA
Straub
DNA
Pedigree
Charts
Census
Records
Every-Name
Indices
Everything I have is online at this web site.  I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case,

please include a link to the page you are referencing.
There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page.

"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go?
The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control.
Table of Contents
Go to Table of Contents
 
Privacy Policy ______
Every-Name Index
Go to Every-Name Index

¤