Go to Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Diana, Goddess of the Hunt for Ancestors!
 
Go to Every-Name Index
Every-Name Index
James Thomas GLASGOW
Margaret Anne MORROW
Husband:  James Thomas GLASGOW
Birth:  16 May 1788, Newberry Co., SC
Death:  28 Oct 1849, Abbeville Co., SC
Marriage:  27 Feb 1810, Abbeville Dist., SC
Wife:  Margaret Ann / Anne MORROW
Birth:  17 Feb 1793, Abbeville Co., SC
Death:  23 Jul 1842, Abbeville Co., SC
Children born in Abbeville Co., SC:
  1?  (Child) GLASGOW, b. ca. 1812; d. by 1820
  2.  Thomas Morrow GLASGOW, b. 30 Jun 1814
  3.  Marianne / Mary Anne GLASGOW, b. 11 June 1816; d. 22 Apr 1872
  4.  Jane Elizabeth GLASGOW, b. 11 Jun 1818; d. ca. 1892

  5.  Nancy Clementine GLASGOW, b. 21 Jul 1821; d. 1 Jul 1904
  6.  Louise Catherine GLASGOW, b. 16 Oct 1824; d. 17 Jun 1831
  7.  (Daughter A) GLASGOW, b. 1825-30; alive in 1830, but deceased by 1840
  8.  (Daughter B) GLASGOW, b. 1825-30; alive in 1830, but deceased by 1840
  9.  (Daughter C) GLASGOW, b. 1825-30; alive in 1830, but deceased by 1840

10.  Sarah E. GLASGOW, b. 7 Dec 1831; d. 17 Feb 1902
11? (Child) GLASGOW, b. ca. 1833; d. by 1840
12.  James Norris GLASGOW, b. 1 May 1835; d 13 Jun 1865

Keywords for search engines:  genealogy; USA, US, United States, South Carolina

Sources:

1.  Marriage Record:

2.  1810 U.S. Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #21 of 58; official enumeration date 6 Aug 1810; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
1810 SC Abbeville Co. Abbeville Roll 60 p. 47 Ln. 7 James Glasgo 00100-00100-00
These data indicate:
No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred
1 male 16-25 1784-1794 = James (b. 1785) or James Thomas (b. 1788)
1 female 16-25 1784-1794 = Mary (b. 1792) or Margaret Anne (b. 1793)
There should be two young married James GLASGOWs in Abbeville, but I only find one, and this record could be either one.  Listed next to William & Ann (MORROW) THOMPSON and ten lines from John GLASGO.

3.  1820 U.S. Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #13 of 67; official enumeration date 7 Aug 1820; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
1820 SC Abbeville Co. Abbeville Roll M33_118 p. 15 Ln. 29 James Glasgow Senr 100010-20100-0-100 no slaves
These data indicate:
No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred
1 male 9 or under 1810-1820 = Thomas (b. 1814)
1 male 26-44 1775-1794 = James (b. 1788)
2 females 9 or under 1810-1820 = Jane (b. 1818)
= Marianne (b. 1816)
1 female 16-25 1794-1804 = Margaret
1 person engaged in agriculture
Listed next to the other James GLASCOW (the one born in 1785), who should be the "senior" one; however, the children "fit" better if I make our subject the senior one.  Or does it actually say, "Junr"?  It's not exactly clear.

4.  1830 U.S. Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #97-98 of 202; official enumeration date 1 Jun 1830; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
1830 SC Abbeville Co. Roll M19_169 p. 50 Ln. 1 James Glascow 000 100 100 - 320 001 slaves: 100000-301000
These data indicate:
No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred
1 male 15-19 1810-1815 = Thomas (b. 1814) 
1 male 40-49 1780-1790 = James (b. 1788)
3 females 4 or under 1825-1830 = Daughter C
= Daughter B
= Daughter A
2 females 5-9 1820-1825 = Louise (b. 1824)
= Nancy (b. 1821)
1 female 30-39 1790-1800 = Margaret (b. 1793) 

5.  1840 U.S. Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #59-60 of 170; official enumeration began 1 Jun 1840; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
1840 SC Abbeville Co. Roll 507 pp. 31A-31B Ln. 12 J Glasgow 100 000 100 - 010 000 100 no slaves 0100000
These data indicate:
No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred
1 male 4 or under 1835-1840 = James Norris (b. 1835)
1 male 40-49 1790-1800 = James (b. 1788)
1 female 5-9 1830-1835 = Sarah (b. 1831)
1 female 40-49 1790-1800 = Margaret (b. 1793)
1 person employed in agriculture
It's a little odd to have such reversals of fortune, that is, from no slaves in 1820, to five slaves in 1830, back to no slaves in 1840.  Are these all the same James GLASGOW?

6.  1850 U.S. Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com):  James & Mary not found, as expected.  Daughter Sarah GLASGO (æ 19, b. SC) is living in Savannah River Rgmt., Abbeville Dist., SC (p. 33B), with the HUNTER family.  Son James N. GLASGO (æ 14, b. SC) is also living in Savannah River Rgmt. (p. 34B), with his married brother, Thomas M. GLASCO (æ 33, b. SC), and his family (q.v.).  These are the only GLASGO/GLASGOWs indexed in the county.

7.  LDS.  Family Search:  Pedigree Resouce File (online at familysearch.org).

8.  Public Member Trees (online at Ancestry.com).

Contact Home
Page
Table of
Contents
DNA
Hub
Biddle
DNA
Carrico
DNA
Corbin
DNA
Cupp
DNA
Danish
DNA
Ely
DNA
Lyon(s)
DNA
Rasey
DNA
Reason
DNA
Rose
DNA
Straub
DNA
Pedigree
Charts
Census
Records
Every-Name
Indices
Everything I have is online at this web site.  I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case,

please include a link to the page you are referencing.
There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page.

"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go?
The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control.
Table of Contents
Go to Table of Contents
 
Privacy Policy ______
Every-Name Index
Go to Every-Name Index

¤