Go to Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Diana, Goddess of the Hunt for Ancestors!
 
Go to Every-Name Index
Every-Name Index
Samuel EPPARD
Mary STROUP
Husband:  Samuel EPHERD / EPPARD / EPPORD
Birth:  1807/8, MD
Death:  aft. 1860 census, possibly in Madison Twp., Clark Co., OK
Occupation:  farmer
Marriage:  11 Jun 1829, Madison Co., OH
Wife:  Mary "Polly" STROUP
Birth:  15 Jan 1812, OH either in Ross Co., OH, or Madison Co., OH
Death:  aft. 1860 census, possibly in Madison Twp., Clark Co., OK
Occupation:  homemaker
Father:  William STROUP
Mother:  Ann THOMAS
Children:
born in OH, presumably in either Madson Co., OH, or Bath Twp., Greene Co., OH:
1.  John EPPARD, b. 1831/2
2.  Simon EPPARD, b. 1834/5
3.  (Son A) EPPARD, b. 1835-40
4.  Joseph EPPARD, b. 1837/8

born in OH, presumably in either Bath Twp., Green Co., OH, or Madison Twp., Clark Co., OH:
5.  Anna EPPARD, b. 1841/2
6.  Naomi EPPARD, b. 1844/5

Keywords for search engines:  genealogy; USA, US, United States, Maryland, Ohio

Sources:

1.  Anon.  1966.  Marriage Index:  Ohio, 1789-1850.  Liahona Research, Orem, UT (Broderbund CD-400):
Epherd, Samuel Stroup, Polly 11 Jun 1829 Madison Co.

2.  1840 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com):  can't find.

3.  1840 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #15-16 of 20; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤
1840 OH Greene Co. Bath Twp. Roll 396 pp. 224B-225A Ln. 26 Saml Eppord 220 101 - 000 010 _______
These data indicate:
No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred
2 males 4 or under 1835-1840 = Joseph (b. 1837/8)
= Son A
2 males 5-9 1830-1835 = Simon (b. 1834/5)
= John (b. 1831/2)
1 male 15-19 1820-1825 = ?
1 male 30-39 1800-1810 = Samuel (b. 1807/8)
1 female 20-29 1810-1820 = Mary (b. 1812)
The teenage male is too old to be our subject's son. This enumerator did not record occupation.

4.  1850 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com; Image #31 of 36):  Madison Twp., Clark Co., OH, Roll 666, p. 156A, 1424/1435, enumerated 25 Sep 1850, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1850 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤
Saml Eppard 42 M   Farmer 200 Md
Mary    " 38 F       O
John    " 18 M   Farmer   Md
Simon   " 15 M   "   O
Joseph  " 12 M       "
Anna    "  8 F       "
Naomi   "  5 F       "
I have no explanation for John being born in MD, except that he might be Samuel's (youngest) brother or nephew, though in which case he should have been listed last.  I would have thought he was Samuel's son from a prior marriage, but Samuel & Mary were married several years before John was born or is John's age wrong?  One way or another, this appears to be an enumerator error of one kind or another.

5.  1860 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #14 of 25 indexed "Eppord"):  South Charleston P.O., Madison Twp., Clarke [Clark] Co., OH, Roll M653_943, p. 69A/137, PN 62, 440/453, enumerated 3 Jul 1860, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1860 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤
Saml Eppard 51 M   Farmer 2500 415 Md
Mary 44 F         O
Joseph 19 M         "
Naomi 15 F         "
Listed next to married son, Simon EPPORD (æ 26, b. OH).

6.  1870 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com):  can't find.

Contact Home
Page
Table of
Contents
DNA
Hub
Biddle
DNA
Carrico
DNA
Corbin
DNA
Cupp
DNA
Danish
DNA
Ely
DNA
Lyon(s)
DNA
Rasey
DNA
Reason
DNA
Rose
DNA
Straub
DNA
Pedigree
Charts
Census
Records
Every-Name
Indices
Everything I have is online at this web site.  I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case,

please include a link to the page you are referencing.
There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page.

"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go?
The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control.
Table of Contents
Go to Table of Contents
 
Privacy Policy ______
Every-Name Index
Go to Every-Name Index

¤