Thomas CORBIN & Ms. __?__ & Ms. __?_

Table of Contents

Diana, Goddess of the Hunt — for Ancestors!

Every-Name Index

Thomas CORBIN
Ms. __?__
Ms. __?__

Husband: Thomas CORBIN
Birth: 1780-90
Occupation: farmer

Marriage-1:

Wife-1: Ms. __?__
Birth: 1775-94
Death: 1820-30, Pittsylvania Co., VA
Occupation: homemaker

Marriage-2: 1820-30

Wife-2: Ms. __?__
Birth: 1800-1810
Occupation: homemaker

Children with Wife-1:

1. (Son A) CORBIN, b. 1804-1810
2. (Daughter A) CORBIN, b. 1810-15
3. (Daughter B) CORBIN, b. 1810-15
4. (Daughter C) CORBIN, b. 1810-15
5. (Son B) CORBIN, b. 1815-20
6. (Daughter D) CORBIN, b. 1815-20
7. (Daughter E) CORBIN, b. 1815-20
8. (Daughter F) CORBIN, b. 1820-25

Children with Wife-1 or Wife-2 — born in Pittsylvania Co., VA:

9. (Son C) CORBIN, b. 1825-30
10. (Daughter G) CORBIN, b. 1825-30
11. (Daughter H) CORBIN, b. 1825-30

Keywords for search engines: genealogy; USA, US, United States, Virginia

Sources:

1. Marriage Record:

2. 1820 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #8 of 63; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

1820 VA Pittsylvania Co. Roll M33_140 p. 50 Ln. 10 Thomas Corbin 110011-5001?-0-200 no slaves

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

1 male 9 or under 1810-1820 = Son B

1 male 10-15 1804-1810 = Son A

1 male 26-44 1775-1794 = Thomas

1 male 45 or over in or bef. 1775 = father? father-in-law?

5 females 9 or under 1810-1820 = Daughter E
= Daughter D
= Daughter C
= Daughter B
= Daughter A

1 female 26-44 1775-1794 = Wife-1

? female 45 or over in or bef. 1775 = mother? mother-in-law?

2 persons engaged in agriculture

I can't tell whether the column for the eldest females is a 1 or a skinny zero made from a 1. It's definitely not a ditto mark, which is what the enumerator used to indicate zero.

3. 1830 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #159-160 of 196; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

1830 VA Pittsylvania Co. Roll 201 p. 394 Ln. 17 Thos Corbin 101 000 100 - 212 310 no slaves

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

1 male 4 or under 1825-1830 = Son C

1 male 10-14 1815-1820 = Son B

1 male 40-49 1780-1790 = Thomas

2 females 4 or under 1825-1830 = Daughter H
= Daughter G

1 female 5-9 1820-1825 = Daughter F

2 females 10-14 1815-1820 = Daughter E
= Daughter D

3 females 15-19 1810-1815 = Daughter C
= Daughter B
= Daughter A

1 female 20-29 1800-1810 = Wife-2

The extraordinary number of daughters clinches that the Thomas in 1820 is the same man as the Thomas in 1830, and the fact that he is in his 40s in 1830 clinches that he is the younger man in 1820.

4. 1840 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com): not found, at least not in Pittsylvania County.

Contact Home
Page Table of
Contents DNA
Hub Biddle
DNA Carrico
DNA Corbin
DNA Cupp
DNA Danish
DNA Ely
DNA Lyon(s)
DNA Rasey
DNA Reason
DNA Rose
DNA Straub
DNA Pedigree
Charts Census
Records Every-Name
Indices

Everything I have is online at this web site. I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case,
please include a link to the page you are referencing.
There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page.

"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go?
The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control.

Table of Contents

Every-Name Index