Barton CARRICO & Charlotte OWENS

Table of Contents

Diana, Goddess of the Hunt — for Ancestors!

Every-Name Index

Barton CARRICO
Charlotte OWENS

Husband: Bartholomew "Barton" CARRICO / CARRICOE
Birth (based on censuses): 1784-94
Death (based on censuses): 1820-30
Occupation: farmer
Father possibly: William CARRICO I

Marriage: 23 Apr 1810, Fauquier Co., VA

Wife: Charlotte OWENS
Birth: 1775-84 or 1777/8
Death: aft. 1850 census
Occupation: homemaker

Children — born in Prince William Co., VA:

1. (Son A) CARRICO, b. 1810-20
2. Harrison CARRICO, b. 1814/5

Keywords for search engines: genealogy; USA, US, United States, Virginia

Sources:

1. Jordan R. Dodd, ed. 1993. Virginia Marriages: Early to 1850. Liahona Research, Orem, UT (Broderbund CD-229):

Carrico, Barton Owens, Charlotte 23 Apr 1810 Fauquier Co.

2. 1810 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #8 of 14; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

1810 VA Prince William Co. Roll 70 p. 282/520 Ln. 25 Barton Carricoe 00100-00010-0-000

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

1 male 16-25 1784-1794 = Barton

1 female 26-44 1765-1784 = Charlotte

The columns for Prince William County were non-standard. Other than the columns for males and females, I don't know what the numbers stand for. Other CARRICOs in the county: William I and William II.

3. 1820 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com; Image #6 of 34 — list was roughly alphabetized; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

1820 VA Prince William Co. Roll M33_130 p. 247B Ln. 5 Carrico Barton 20010-00020-0-600 2011-2012

These data indicate:

No., Race, Gender Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

2 white males 9 or under 1810-1820 = Harrison (b. 1814/5)
= Son A

1 white male 26-44 1775-1794 = Barton

2 white females 26-44 1775-1794 = Wife
= ?

6 people engaged in agriculture

2 male slaves 13 and under 1806-1820 = ? ?

1 male slave 26-44 1775-1794 = ?

1 male slave 45 or over in or bef. 1775 = ?

2 female slaves 13 and under 1806-1820 = ? ?

1 female slave 26-44 1775-1794 = ?

2 female slaves 45 or over in or bef. 1775 = ? ?

The columns used in Prince William were non-standard: the age-ranges for the males were the same as those for the females (columns headed 10, 16, 26, 45, 45+ for both genders). Other CARRICOs in the county: Josiah and William II.

4. 1830 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com): can't find.

5. 1840 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #108-109 of 113; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

1840 VA Prince William Co. Roll 574 pp. 296B-297A Ln. 21 Harrison Carrico 000 010 - 000 000 100 010 no slaves _______

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

1 male 20-29 1810-1820 = Harrison

1 female 40-49 1790-1800 = ?

1 female 80-89 1750-1760 = ?

One of these older women should be Charlotte, but either way, she's in the wrong age class.

6. 1850 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com): can't find Harrison or Charlotte.

7. 1860 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #57 of 150 — indexed "Carieo"): Tudor Hall P.O., Prince William Co., VA, Roll M653_1371, p. 473, PN 55, 302/287, enumerated 11 Jul 1860, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1860 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

Harrison Carico 44 M Farm Laborer Virginia

Jane " 27 F "

Willie Ann " 4 F "

Charlotte " 82 F "

Charlotte's age may be inflated here.

Contact Home
Page Table of
Contents DNA
Hub Biddle
DNA Carrico
DNA Corbin
DNA Cupp
DNA Danish
DNA Ely
DNA Lyon(s)
DNA Rasey
DNA Reason
DNA Rose
DNA Straub
DNA Pedigree
Charts Census
Records Every-Name
Indices

Everything I have is online at this web site. I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case,
please include a link to the page you are referencing.
There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page.

"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go?
The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control.

Table of Contents

Every-Name Index