William CHAMBERS & Nancy LITTLE

Table of Contents

Diana, Goddess of the Hunt — for Ancestors!

Every-Name Index

William CHAMBERS
Nancy LITTLE

Husband: William CHAMBERS
Birth: 1780-90, Ireland
Death: Sep 1847, Allegany Co., MD
Occupation: manufacture and trade
Migration: said to have immigrated at the age of 2

Marriage: ca. 1818, Somerset Co., PA

Wife: Nancy LITTLE
Birth: 1800-04, PA
Occupation: homemaker
Other Spouse: m2. Mr. FINDLEY

Children:

1. (Son A) CHAMBERS, b. 1815-20
2. Mary Ann CHAMBERS, b. 6 Dec 1821

— born in Allegany Co., MD:
3. Andrew CHAMBERS, b. 1822; d. Mar 1845
4. (Daughter A) CHAMBERS, b. 1820-25
5. Elizabeth CHAMBERS, b. Jun 1825; d. Sep 1918, Garrett Co., MD
6. (Daughter B) CHAMBERS, b. 1825-30; d. bef. 1840
7. Emily CHAMBERS, b. 1829
8. James Armstrong CHAMBERS, b. 30 Mar 1832
9. John Wesley CHAMBERS, b. 2 Oct 1834
10. Hannah Ellen CHAMBERS, b. Nov 1836; d. aft. 1900
11. Elizan / Eligan CHAMBERS, b. 1838; d. 1840, Allegany Co., MD
12. McHenry [M.H.] CHAMBERS, b. 20 Feb 1839; d. aft. 1905, Sedgwick Co., KS

— born in Preston Co., VA [now WV]
13. Columbia CHAMBERS, b. 18 Oct 1842

Keywords for search engines: genealogy; USA, US, United States, Kansas, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia

Sources:

1. Marriage Record:

2. 1820 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #5 of 5; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):-

1820 PA Somerset Co. Brothersvalley Twp. Roll M33_111 p. 136 Ln. 1 William Chambers 100010-00100-0-001

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

1 male 9 or under 1810-1820 = Son A

1 male 26-44 1775-1794 = William

1 female 16-25 1794-1804 = Nancy

1 person engaged in manufacture

3. 1830 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #7-8 of 12 — indexed "Cambens"; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):-

1830 MD Allegany Co. Dist. No. 1 Roll 53 p. 5B-6A Ln. 10 William Chambers 001 010 100 - 320 010 no slaves

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

1 male 10-14 1815-1820 = Son A

1 male 20-29 1800-1810 = hired hand?

1 male 40-49 1780-1790 = William

3 females 4 or under 1825-1830 = Emily (b. 1829)
= Daughter B
= Elizabeth (b. 1825)

2 females 5-9 1820-1825 = Daughter A
= Mary Ann (b. 1821)

1 female 20-29 1800-1810 = Nancy

Where's Andrew?

4. 1840 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #11-12 of 14; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):-

1840 MD Allegany Co. Glades Roll 156 pp. 93B-94A Ln. 18 William Chambers 120 100 010 - 101 301 no slaves 0101000

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

1 male 4 or under 1835-1840 = McHenry (b. 1839)

2 males 5-9 1830-1835 = John (b. 1834)
= James (b. 1832)

1 male 15-19 1820-1825 = Andrew (b. 1822)

1 male 50-59 1780-1790 = William

1 female 4 or under 1835-1840 = Hannah (b. 1836)

1 female 10-14 1825-1830 = Emily (b. 1829)

3 females 15-19 1820-1825 = Elizabeth (b. 1825)
= Daughter A
= Mary Ann (b. 1821)

1 female 30-39 1800-1810 = Nancy

1 person employed in agriculture

1 person employed in manufacture and trade

5. 1850 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com): can't find. Nancy is said to have remarried and moved to Pennsylvania.

6. Public Member Trees (online at Ancestry.com).

7. WorldConnect / Ancestry World Trees (online at RootsWeb.com/Ancestry.com).

8. Emails from Flo Abel.

Contact Home
Page Table of
Contents DNA
Hub Biddle
DNA Carrico
DNA Corbin
DNA Cupp
DNA Danish
DNA Ely
DNA Lyon(s)
DNA Rasey
DNA Reason
DNA Rose
DNA Straub
DNA Pedigree
Charts Census
Records Every-Name
Indices

Everything I have is online at this web site. I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do.
On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me, but in which case,
please include a link to the page you are referencing.
There are over 18,000 pages on this web site, and I simply don't remember every page, much less every person on every page.

"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go?
The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control.

Table of Contents

Every-Name Index