Table of Contents |
Diana, Goddess
of the Hunt — for Ancestors!
|
Every-Name Index |
The Rebound 1810 Census of Cayuga County, New York |
I discuss the problem of rebound censuses
on
another page. Sad to say, Cayuga County in 1810 (Roll M252-31)
is one such afflicted county. The problem is compounded by the pages
being microfilmed as two-page spreads, instead of individually, because
this is what places unrelated pages together in the same frame/image.
If the tables below look complicated, they are, but Ancestry.com (and Genealogy.com) could straighten this out, and the solution is much simpler than it was figuring out the problem and creating the tables. Simply… 1. Slice all the two-page spreads into single pages.That's all it would take. Not only would this be a more accurate representation of the census, it would cut storage and bandwith requirements by 50%, not to mention making it easier for customers to use (in part by reducing the number of pages mis-linked from the index). Most important of all, it would reduce the errors being made by those who are unaware of the problem. If the reorganization isn't done, it would be far better if Ancestry.com and Genealogy.com would not group the images by town, but keep them together as a single group. At least then it wouldn't delude people that the images are correctly grouped. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Towns" in Cayuga County are civil divisions equivalent to townships. Several villages were enumerated within the towns, but I could only tell where they started, not where they ended, so I did not differentiate those pages in the tables below. Each pair of pages had a subtotal, but the totals for each town were not at the end of each town, but at the end of the county as part of the final tally. Genealogy.com and the Broderbund Census Index CD have the Cayuga County images ordered and indexed by the frame numbers of the microfilm, which has nothing to do with the page numbers on the census pages themselves. Such a number is a bad choice to use as a "page number" because it will vary depending on the vendor supplying the microfilm, which is exemplified in this case because the "page" numbers given at Genealogy.com and on the Broderbund CD are "off" by one or two digits (at least on the names I checked). The images at Genealogy.com begin with page [frame] 3 of the microfilm, which is the same census page as Image #1 in the Sempronius group at Ancestry.com, but I didn't want to complicate the table below by adding another set of "page" numbers to it. Ancestry.com has Cayuga County indexed by the actual four-digit census page numbers, which would make linking the index entries to the correct page so easy if they would just regroup the pages as above. As it stands, many index entries are mis-linked, often to the right page, but in the wrong group. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
The pattern here, due to the unfolding and rebinding, has resulted in two alternating sets of numbers proceeding from the header/intro page in the middle of the film, forward to the beginning of the film, with a turn-around in Sempronius, then back to the middle where the numbers then proceed to the end of the film, with a turn-around in Scipio, then back to the middle of the film where the sequence ends with the tally pages. There's a gap in pagination between nos. 1185 and 1192 (in Aurelius) which is noted on the pages themselves (see below), so appears not to represent a loss of information, yet one has to wonder what was on pages 1186-1191. |
†Image is of two two-page spreads, with the bottom half of the bottom page cut off (not cut off at Genealogy.com).
|
Contact | Home Page |
Table of Contents |
DNA Hub |
Biddle DNA |
Carrico DNA |
Corbin DNA |
Cupp DNA |
Danish DNA |
Ely DNA |
Lyon(s) DNA |
Rasey DNA |
Reason DNA |
Rose DNA |
Straub DNA |
Pedigree Charts |
Census Records |
Every-Name Indices |
"The Cloud" is double-speak for "dumb terminal
on a main frame." Been there; done that. Never again.
You are giving away not only your privacy, but control of your data, your apps, and your computer to a corporation. Is that really where you want to go? The IT guys on the big iron hated the Personal Computer because it gave users freedom and power; now they've conned you into being back under their control. |
Table of Contents
|
Privacy
Policy ______
|
Every-Name Index
|