| Sources:
1. Marriage Record:
2. 1790 Census Index and Digital Images (online at Ancestry.com;
Image #8 of 9; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
| 1790 |
NC |
Montgomery Co. |
p. 417 |
Ln. 16 |
Young Stokes |
2-3-1-0-0 |
These data indicate:
| Gender and Type |
Age Class |
Therefore Born |
Individuals Inferred |
| 2 free white males |
16 or over |
in or bef. 1774 |
= Young
= son? |
| 3 free white males |
15 or under |
1774-1790 |
= daughters? |
| 1 free white females |
all ages |
in or bef. 1790 |
= wife? daughter? |
This obviously is not our subject, but who is he? Surely he is related
to the Young STOKES in Montgomery Co., NC, in 1880. List roughly
alphabetized.
3a. Census Index: U.S. Selected Counties, 1800 (Broderbund
CD-312). Please see my WARNING
regarding use of this database (the numerical data have the genders switched).
Worse yet, the county should be Montgomery, not Mecklenburg.
| 1800 |
Stokes, Young |
NC |
Mecklenburg Co. |
p. 505 |
00100-1010000 |
3b. 1800 Census Index and Digital Images (online at Ancestry.com;
Image #42 of 60; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
| 1800 |
NC |
Montgomery Co. |
Salisbury Dist. |
p. 251/503/505 |
Ln. 4 |
Young Stokes |
10100-00100-00 |
These data indicate:
| No. & Sex |
Age Class |
Therefore Born |
Individuals Inferred |
| 1 male |
9 or under |
1790-1800 |
= John (b. 1797/8) |
| 1 male |
16-25 |
1774-1784 |
= Young (b. 1779/80) |
| 1 female |
16-25 |
1774-1784 |
= Sarah (b. 1780-84) |
This, too, is not our subject, if the 1810 record is correct. On
the other hand, if the two girls in 1810 aren't their daughters, this could
be our subjects. List roughly alphabetized, and pages are out of
order.
4a. Census Index: U.S. Selected Counties, 1810 (Broderbund
CD-313). Please see my WARNING
regarding use of this database (the numerical data have the genders switched).
| 1810 |
Stokes, Young |
KY |
Christian Co. |
p. 77 |
12010-1101100 |
4b. 1810 Census Index and Digital Images (online at Ancestry.com;
Image #26 of 66; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
| 1810 |
KY |
Christian Co. |
p. 77/554 |
Ln. 8 |
Young Stokes |
11011-12010-00 |
These data indicate:
| No. & Sex |
Age Class |
Therefore Born |
Individuals Inferred |
| 1 male |
9 or under |
1800-1810 |
= James (b. 1804) |
| 1 male |
10-15 |
1794-1800 |
= John (b. 1797/8) |
| 1 male |
26-44 |
1765-1784 |
= Young (b. 1772 or 1779/80) |
| 1 male |
45 or over |
in or bef. 1765 |
= father? father-in-law? |
| 1 female |
9 or under |
1800-1810 |
= Lucinda (b. 1809) |
| 2 females |
10-15 |
1794-1800 |
= Daughter B
= Daughter A |
| 1 female |
26-44 |
1765-1784 |
= Sarah (b. 1780-84) |
Other STOKES in county: brothers John,
Matthew,
and Jones.
5a. Census Index: U.S. Selected Counties, 1820 (Broderbund
CD-314):
| 1820 |
Stokes, Young |
IL |
White Co. |
Fox River Twp. |
p. 177 |
|
|
| 1820 State Census |
Stokes, Young |
IL |
White Co. |
|
p. 352 |
22 Nov 1820 |
02-04-00-00 |
5b. 1820 Census Index and Digital Images (online at Ancestry.com;
Image #1 of 7; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
| 1820 |
IL |
White Co. |
Fox River Twp. |
p. 177 |
Ln. 8 |
Young Stokes |
101201-01010-0-200 |
These data indicate:
| No. & Sex |
Age Class |
Therefore Born |
Individuals Inferred |
| 1 male |
9 or under |
1810-1820 |
= George? |
| 1 male |
16-18 |
1801-1804 |
= James (b. 1804) |
| 2 males |
19-25* |
1794-1801 |
= John (b. 1797/8)
= ? |
| 1 male |
45 or over |
in or bef. 1775 |
= Young (b. 1772 or 1779/80) |
| 1 female |
10-15 |
1804-1810 |
= Lucinda (b. 1809) |
| 1 female |
26-44 |
1775-1794 |
= Sarah (b. 1780-84) |
| 2 |
person engaged in agriculture |
| *In the 1820 Census, the third column is
age class 16-18 and the fourth column is age class 16-25; therefore, any
individual in column three is duplicated in column four. By subtracting
the number in column three from the number in column four, you can create
an age class "19-25." |
He is the only STOKES in the county.
. 1830 Census Index and Digital Images (online at Ancestry.com;
Image #29 of 74; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
| 1830 |
IL |
White Co. |
p. 16 |
Ln. 22 |
Young Stokes |
001 000 010 - 000 010 100 |
These data indicate:
| No. & Sex |
Age Class |
Therefore Born |
Individuals Inferred |
| 1 male |
10-14 |
1815-1820 |
= George? |
| 1 male |
50-59 |
1770-1780 |
= Young (b. 1772 or 1779/80) |
| 1 female |
20-29 |
1800-1810 |
= Lucinda (b. 1809) |
| 1 female |
40-49 |
1780-1790 |
= Sarah (b. 1780-84) |
Listed one line above their son, John
M. STOKES, who is one line above their son, James
G. STOKES.
. 1840 Census Index and Digital Images (online at Ancestry.com;
Image #11 of 84; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
| 1840 |
IL |
White Co. |
p. 278 |
Ln. 2 |
Yong Stokes |
000 000 001 - 000 000 010 |
0100000 |
These data indicate:
| No. & Sex |
Age Class |
Therefore Born |
Individuals Inferred |
| 1 male |
60-69 |
1770-1780 |
= Young (b. 1772 or 1779/80) |
| 1 female |
50-59 |
1780-1790 |
= Sarah (b. 1780-84) |
| 1 |
person employed in agriculture |
Listed two lines below son, John
M. STOKES, and one line above son, James
G. STOKES.
. 1850 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com; Image
#11-12 of 76): District 13, White Co., IL, pp. 271A-271B, 69/69,
enumerated 19 Aug 1850, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1850 (extracted
by Diana Gale Matthiesen):
| John M Stockes |
52 |
M |
Farmer |
1000 |
NC |
| Mary Do |
42 |
F |
|
|
Ky |
| [John & Mary's
six children] |
| [next page] |
| Young Stokes |
70 |
M |
None |
200 |
NC |
Young should be 78 years old, but it's clearly "70." John M. "STOCKES" is
Young STOKES's son (for full record, see John's
family group sheet). They are living ten households from Young's
son, James
G. STOKES.
. WorldConnect / Ancestry World Trees (online at RootsWeb.com/Ancestry.com).
. Messages on the Christian County, Kentucky, Query Board
(online at Ancestry.com/RootsWeb.com).
. Messages in the Stokes Family Genealogy Forum (online
at GenForum.com). One message says Young's tombstone reads 1772-1856. |