Conventon CORBIN & Sarah Ann DRUMMOND

Diana, Goddess of the Hunt — for Ancestors!

Coventon CORBIN
Sarah Ann DRUMMOND

NOTE: Given the age difference between Coventon and Sarah, it's likely he had a prior wife and earlier children.

Husband: Coventon CORBIN
Birth: 1765-70, Accomack Co., VA
Death: ca. 1845, Accomack Co., VA
Father: Ralph CORBIN III
Mother: Rachel __?__

Marriage: 31 Mar 1807, Accomack Co., VA

Wife: Sarah Ann "Sally" DRUMMOND
Birth: 1784/5, Accomack Co., VA
Death: 1850-60, Accomack Co., VA
Father: Charles DRUMMOND (1755-1822)
Mother: Comfort Nock STOCKLEY (c1757-1823)

Children — born in Accomack Co., VA:

1. (Son A) CORBIN, b. 1807-10
2. Sarah Ann "Sally" CORBIN, b. ca. 1807
3? (Son B) CORBIN, b. 1810
4. Elizabeth CORBIN, b. ca. 1811
5. Stephen CORBIN, b. 28 Mar 1815; d. 2 Oct 1884, Accomack Co., VA; m. ca. 1835, Mary MILES
6. James Herbert CORBIN, b. 25 Jun 1817
7. Mary Jane CORBIN, b. 28 Jan 1820; m. Noah (Neal) PARKS
8. Lavinia CORBIN, b. 1825
9. Emiline / Emaline CORBIN, b. ca. 1828; m. Henry PARKER
10. (Son C) CORBIN, b. 1825-30

Grandchild:

. Cornelius CORBIN, b. 1846/7, VA

Keywords for search engines: USA, US, United States, Virginia

Sources:

1. Marriage Record:

2. 1810 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #14 of 69 — list was roughly alphabetized; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

1810 VA Accomack Co. Accomack Par. Roll 66 p. 85 Ln. 11 Coventon Corban 10010-10100-04

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

1 male 9 or under 1800-1810 = Son A

1 male 26-44 1765-1784 = Coventon (b. 1765-70)

1 female 9 or under 1800-1810 = Sarah Ann (b. ca. 1807)

1 female 16-25 1784-1794 = Sarah (b. 1784/5)

4 slaves all ages by 1810 = ? ? ? ?

Listed one line above Robert CORBAN and one line below George CORBAN, who is six lines below Ralph CORBAN.

3. 1820 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #26 of 27 — indexed "Coomton Corban"; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

1820 VA Accomack Co. Accomack Par. Roll M33_129 p. 30 Ln. 31 Coventon Corban 220001-30010-0-300 2010-0102 0000-0000

These data indicate:

No., Race, Gender Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

2 white males 9 or under 1810-1820 = James (b. 1817)
= Stephen (b. 1815)

2 white males 10-15 1804-1810 = Son B
= Son A

1 white male 45 or over in or bef. 1775 = Coventon (b. 1765-70)

3 white females 9 or under 1810-1820 = Mary Jane (b. 1820)
= Elizabeth (b. ca. 1813)
= Sarah Ann (b. ca. 1810)

1 white female 26-44 1775-1794 = Sarah (b. 1784/5)

3 people engaged in agriculture

2 male slaves 13 and under 1806-1820 = ? ?

1 male slave 26-44 1775-1794 = ?

1 female slave 14-25 1794-1806 = ?

2 female slaves 45 or over in or bef. 1775 = ? ?

Listed one line above George CORBAN, who is one line above Robert CORBAN.

4. 1830 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #15-16 of 86 — list was roughly alphabetized; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

1830 VA Accomack Co. Accomack Pa. Roll 192 p. 328 Ln. 15 Corbin Coventon 102 020 001 - 112 110 100 020010-112010

These data indicate:

No., Race, Gender Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

1 white male 4 or under 1825-1830 = Son C?

2 white males 10-14 1815-1820 = James (b. 1817)
= Stephen (b. 1815)

2 white males 20-29 1800-1810 = Son B
= Son A

1 white male 60-69 1760-1770 = Coventon (b. 1765-70)

1 white female 4 or under 1825-1830 = Emaline (b. ca. 1828)

1 white female 5-9 1820-1825 = Lavinia (b. 1825)

2 white females 10-14 1815-1820 = Mary Jane (b. 1820)
= Elizabeth (b. ca. 1813?)

1 white female 15-19 1810-1815 = Sarah Ann (b. ca. 1811)

1 white female 20-29 1800-1810 = daughter-in-law?

1 white female 40-49 1780-1790 = Sarah (b. 1784/5)

2 male slaves 10-23 1806-1820 = ? ?

1 male slave 55-99 1730-1775 = ?

1 female slave 9 or under 1820-1830 = ?

1 female slave 10-23 1806-1820 = ?

2 female slaves 24-35 1794-1806 = ? ?

1 female slave 55-99 1730-1775 = ?

It's looking like we have more than the nuclear family here.

5. 1840 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #13-14 of 170; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

1840 VA Accomack Co. Roll 549 pp. 7B-8A Ln. 22 Coventon Corbin 120 021 000 100 - 201 210 010 001100-110120 0820200

These data indicate:

No. & Sex Age Class Therefore Born Individuals Inferred

1 white male 4 or under 1835-1840 =

2 white males 5-9 1830-1835 =

2 white males 20-29 1810-1820 = James (b. 1817)
= Stephen (b. 1815)

1 white male 30-39 1800-1810 = Son A or B

1 white male 70-79 1760-1770 = Coventon (b. 1765-70)

2 white females 4 or under 1835-1840 =

1 white female 10-14 1825-1830 =

2 white females 15-19 1820-1825 =

1 white female 20-29 1810-1820 =

1 white female 50-59 1780-1790 = Sarah (b. 1784/5)

1 male slave 24-35 1804-1816 = ?

1 male slave 36-54 1785-1804 = ?

1 female slave 9 or under 1830-1840 = ?

1 female slave 10-23 1816-1830 = ?

1 female slave 36-54 1785-1804 = ?

2 female slaves 55-99 1740-1784 = ? ?

8 persons employed in agriculture

2 persons employed in commerce

2 persons employed in navigation of the ocean

Again, it looks like there's one or more married children and some grandchildren living with them.

6. 1850 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com, Image #114 of 153): Accomack Parish, Accomack Co., VA, Roll M432_932, p. 57B, 926/926, enumerated 28 Sep 1850, official enumeration date 1 Jun 1850 (extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

Gilles P Ewell 45 M Farmer 1500 Va

Solomon    " 19 M Laborer "

Gilles     " 17 M Ditto "

John S     " 16 M "

Jane       " 14 F "

Matilda    " 12 F "

Elizabeth " 10 F "

Sarah      " 8 F "

Malinda    " 10 F "

Sarah A Corbin 65 F "

Cornelius " 3 M "

7. 1860 Census Every-Name-Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com): not found.

8. WorldConnect / Ancestry World Trees (online at RootsWeb.com/Ancestry.com).

9. Family Group Sheet from descendant.

Contact Home
Page Table of
Contents DNA
Hub Biddle
DNA Carrico
DNA Corbin
DNA Danish
DNA Rasey
DNA Straub
DNA Pedigree
Charts Census
Records Every-Name
Indices

Everything I have is online at this web site. I have no further information, so please don't write asking me if I do. On the other hand, if you feel I've made an error, please don't hesitate to notify me.

†