1.  Anon.  1966.  Marriage Index:  Ohio, 1789-1850.  Liahona Research, Orem, UT (Broderbund CD-400):  not found.

2.  Census Index:  U.S. Selected Counties, 1810 (Broderbund CD-313):  not found, but the 1810 census of Ohio was destroyed (except for Washington Co.).  Some tax lists are substituted on this CD, including ones from Clermont County, but again, not found.

3.  1820 Census Index/ Images (online at Ancestry.com; Image #4 of 12; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

1820

OH

Clermont Co.

Ohio [now Monroe] Twp.

p. 31/60

Ln. 20

Abraham Corbin

300010-20010-0-100

These data indicate:

No. & Sex	Age Class	Therefore Born	Individuals Inferred
3 males	9 or under	1810-1820	= Son C = Son B = Son A
1 male	26-44	1775-1794	= Abraham (b. 1788)
2 females	9 or under	1810-1820	= Daughter B = Daughter A
1 female	26-44	1775-1794	= Wife
1	person engaged in agriculture

Listed next to Abraham's brother, Nathan CORBIN, Jr.

4.  1830 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com; Image #15 of 20; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

1830

OH

Clermont Co.

Monroe Twp.

p. 235

Ln. 22

Abraham Corbin

111 000 100 - 101 101 000

These data indicate:

No. & Sex	Age Class	Therefore Born	Individuals Inferred
1 male	4 or under	1825-1830	= Son E
1 male	5-9	1820-1825	= Son D
1 male	10-14	1815-1820	= Son C
1 male	40-49	1780-1790	= Abraham (b. 1788)
1 female	4 or under	1825-1830	= Daughter C
1 female	10-14	1815-1820	= Daughter B
1 female	15-19	1810-1815	= Daughter A
1 female	30-39	1790-1800	= Wife

2.  1840 Census Index/Images (online at Ancestry.com; Image #15 of 26; extracted by Diana Gale Matthiesen):¤•

1840

OH

Clermont Co.

Tate Twp.

Roll 384

p. 35

Ln 16

Abram Corbin

001 010 100 - 011 020 010

0200000

These data indicate:

No. & Sex	Age Class	Therefore Born	Individuals Inferred
1 male	10-14	1825-1830	= Son E
1 male	20-29	1810-1820	= Son C
1 male	40-49	1790-1800	= Abram (b. 1788)
1 female	5-9	1830-1835	= Daughter D
1 female	10-14	1825-1830	= Daughter C
2 females	20-29	1810-1820	= Daughter B = Daughter A
1 female	50-59	1780-1790	= Wife (b. 1790-94)
2	persons engaged in agriculture

This may not be our subject, but there is no other middle-aged Abram known in the county who it could be.  My doubt is lessened by the fact that Abraham and his wife should be in each other's age category, which means it could easily be census-taker error.