Go to Home Page Diana, Goddess of the Hunt — for Ancestors!
 
Go to Home Page
 
Lineages and Results of Y-chromosome DNA Testing for Surname CARRICO
and Similar Surnames, such as, CARRIÇO, CARRICOE, CURRICOE, CARICO, CARUCHO, CARACO, CARAÇO, CARRACO, CARACHO, KARAHO, CARASSO, CARAÇOS, CARICCO, etc.
Haplogroup J2
Results
Hub
Y-DNA Haplogroups Represented in the Project Project
Home
 J2  (n = 17 + 1)  L  (n = 2)  R1b  (n = 3)
The J2 subclade of Haplogroup J (see entries at Wikipedia and ISOGG) arose in the northern Fertile Cresent, roughly 18,500 ±3500 years ago.  It then spread westwards around the Mediterranean and broadly eastwards throughout central Asia and south into India.  It is most common in Anatolia (about 25% of Turks are J2).
Our J2 CARRICOs fall into two groups:  those who are descended from Peter CARRICO, the 1674 immigrant to Maryland, and one who was born in Brazil and whose grandfather was born in Portugal.  The former have been deep SNP tested, and they are root/ancestral Haplogroup J-2a4b*.   The latter has not been deep SNP tested, but based on his haplotype, his haplogroup is deduced to be J-2a4b-1. 
J-2a4b* = J-M67 (n = 16 + 1) J-2a4b-1 = J-M92 (n = 1)
These two subclades of Haplogroup J have not shared a common ancestor for about 3000 years, so we currently have two different origins for surname CARRICO.  The J-M67 group includes one individual tested at FTDNA, but outside the project.
Haplogroup J members of the CARRICO project are encouraged to also join the Y-DNA-J Haplogroup Project at FamilyTreeDNA to contribute to the body of knowledge accumulating about this haplogroup and, thus, to increase our own knowledge about ourselves.

Once your first results have returned (when you first get access to your member page), you can join additional FTDNA projects using the blue Join button on your member page and you can upload to Ysearch using the link on the "Y-DNA Matches" tab of your member page.

Haplogroup J Subclades as Defined by SNP Mutations
Mutations Standard
FTDNA ISOGG
M304 12f2.1=12F2a P209 S6 S34 S35 J J
____ M267 J-1 J-1
____ M62 J-1a J-1a
M365 J-1b J-1b
M390 J-1c J-1c
P56 J-1d J-1d
P58 J-1e J-1e
____ M367 M368 J-1e1 J-1e1
M369 J-1e2 J-1e2
M172 J-2 J-2
____ M410 J-2a J-2a
____ M289 J-2a1 J-2a4h-1a1b
M340 J-2a2 J-2a2
P279 J-2a3 J-2a3
L26 L27 J-2a4 J-2a4
____ M47 M322 J-2a4a J-2a4a
M67=S51 J-2a4b J-2a4b
____ M92 M260 J-2a4b-1 J-2a4b-1
____ M327 J-2a4b-1a J-2a4b-1a
M163 M166 J-2a4b-2 J-2a4b-2
M68 J-2a4c J-2a4c
M319 J-2a4d J-2a4d
M339 J-2a4e J-2a4e
M419 J-2a4f J-2a4f
P81 J-2a4g J-2a4g
L24 L25 J-2a4h J-2a4h / J-2a4h-1
__ M137 J-2a4h-1 J-2a4h-1a1a
__ M158 J-2a4h-2 J-2a4h-2
__ M318 J-2a4h-3 J-2a4h-1a1c
M12 M102 M221 M314 J-2b J-2b
____ M205 J-2b1 J-2b1
M241 J-2b2 J-2b2
____ M99 J-2b2a J-2b2a
M280 J-2b2b J-2b2b
M321 J-2b2c J-2b2c
P84 J-2b2d J-2b2d
"Genetic Distance" is the number of mutation events separating individuals.  In the case of the results table below, the difference is measured from the individual to the family's modal haplotype, which is presumably the haplotype of their nearest common ancestor.
To view more of the page without scrolling, temporarily reduce the text size or page size in your browser.
If using Explorer v. 6, from the menubar click View > Text Size > Smaller/Smallest; if using Explorer v. 7, use Ctrl+/- to enlarge or reduce the size of the page.
Red labels indicate markers that typically mutate more frequently than those labeled in black.
(Empty cells that are darkened indicate tests not ordered.)

Haplogroup J-2a4b* = J-M67
The mutation defining this subclade (M67) occurred an estimated 11.6 ± 2.6 thousand years ago.  Today, the subclade is distributed thinly throughout southern and eastern Europe, the Middle East, and northern Africa, but is concentrated in Italy and the countries surrounding the eastern Black Sea, namely, Turkey, Georgia, Armenia, and southern Russia.  See Figure 2, Map E in Semino et al. (2004. American Journal of Human Genetics 74(5):1023-1034) for distribution of J-M67.
To view lineages, please scroll to the right.
G
e
n
e
t
i
c
D
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
Surname Kit # Ysearch
UserID
Haplotype — as determined by STR testing Known Lineage
Markers 1-12 Markers 13-25 Markers 26-37 Markers 38-67
3
9
3
3
9
0
19
/
3
9
4
3
9
1
a
|
3
8
5
b
|
3
8
5
4
2
6
3
8
8
4
3
9
i
|
3
8
9
3
9
2
ii
|
3
8
9
4
5
8
a
|
4
5
9
b
|
4
5
9
4
5
5
4
5
4
4
4
7
4
3
7
4
4
8
4
4
9
a
|
4
6
4
b
|
4
6
4
c
|
4
6
4
d
|
4
6
4
4
6
0
H4
|
G
A
T
A
IIa
|
Y
C
A
IIb
|
Y
C
A
4
5
6
6
0
7
5
7
6
5
7
0
a
|
C
D
Y
b
|
C
D
Y
4
4
2
4
3
8
5
3
1
5
7
8
a
|
S1
3
9
5
b
|
S1
3
9
5
5
9
0
5
3
7
6
4
1
4
7
2
S1
4
0
6
5
1
1
4
2
5
a
|
4
1
3
b
|
4
1
3
5
5
7
5
9
4
4
3
6
4
9
0
5
3
4
4
5
0
4
4
4
4
8
1
5
2
0
4
4
6
6
1
7
5
6
8
4
8
7
5
7
2
6
4
0
4
9
2
5
6
5
  J2 Modals 9EQTH 12 23 14 10 13 17 11 15 12 13 11 29 16 8 9 11 11 26 15 21 29 12 13 15 16 10 10 19 22 15 14 16 17 35 38 11 9 11 7 14 15 8 11 10 8 11 9 12 17 17 14 10 12 12 15 8 12 22 21 13 12 11 13 11 12 12 11 Modals compiled by Al Aburto, Jr., as of 24 Feb 2008 (n=2316).
J2a4b Modals   12 23 14 10 13 17 11 16 11 13 11 30 18 9 9 11 11 26 15 20 29 12 14 15 16 10 10 19 22 15 13 19 17 35 38 12 9 10 7 15 15 8 11 10 8 11 9 12 17 17 14 10 12 12 16 8 11 22 21 13 12 11 13 10 12 12 11 Modals compiled by DGM from Y-DNA Hap J Project as of 23 Aug 2009 (at 12, n=74; at 25, n=68; at 37, n=64; at 67, n=34).
               
0 CARRICO 107978 CUYPH 12 21 15  9 12 17 11 15 10 13 12 30 14 9 9 11 11 25 14 21 30 11 12 15 16 11 10 19 22 18 14 19 16 35 37 11 9 12 7 15 15 8 11 10 8 11 9 10 17 17 14 10 12 12 16 8 12 22 21 12 13 11 13 11 12 12 11 Pvt8, Pvt7, Thomas Francis6, Joseph Haesley5, William Constantine4, Ignatius Francis3, Cornelius, the younger2, Henry1 — of Charles Co., MD, then Washington Co., KY
CARRICO 145426 CPYAV 12 21 15  9 12 17 11 15 10 13 12 30 14 9 9 11 11 25 14 21 30 11 12 15 16 11 10 19 22 18 14 19 16 35 37 11 9 12 7 15 15 8 11 10 8 11 9 10 17 17 14 10 12 12 16 8 12 22 21 12 13 11 13 11 12 12 11 Pvt5, Pvt4, Winant Gillaspy3, William David2, Matthew Gillaspie1 — of Spencer Co., KY, then Panola Co., TX
CARRICO 157080   12 21 15  9 12 17 11 15 10 13 12 30 14 9 9 11 11 25 14 21 30 11 12 15 16 11 10 19 22 18 14 19 16 35 37 11 9 12 7 15 15 8 11 10 8 11 9 10 17 17 14 10 12 12 16 8 12 22 21 12 13 11 13 11 12 12 11 Pvt5, Pvt4, Walter Scott3, Thomas John2, Proteus1 — of Hardin / Larue Cos., KY, then Siskiyou Co., CA
CARRICO 122177   12 21 15  9 12 17 11 15 10 13 12 30 14 9 9 11 11 25 14 21 30 11 12 15 16 11 10 19 22 18 14 19 16 35 37 11 9 12 7 15 15 8 11 10 8 11 9 10 17 17 14 10 12 12 16 8 12 22 21 12 13 11 13 11 12 12 11 Pvt7, Pvt6, Walter Lemuel5, Arthur Wellington4, John Holbert3, Joseph2, Peter1 — of Preston Co., WV
CARRICO 160239   12 21 15  9 12 17 11 15 10 13 12 30 14 9 9 11 11 25 14 21 30 11 12 15 16 11 10 19 22 18 14 19 16 35 37 11 9 12 7 15 15 8 11 10 8 11 9 10 17 17 14 10 12 12 16 8 12 22 21 12 13 11 13 11 12 12 11 Pvt6, Pvt5, Josiah/Joseph Converse4, Basil Jordan3, Josiah2, Charles1 — of MD, then Washington Co., KY, then Sullivan Co., IN ________________________________
1 CARRICO 143924   12 21 15  9 12 17 11 15 10 13 12 30 14 9 9 11 11 25 14 21 30 11 12 15 16 11 10 19 22 18 14 19 16 35 36 11 9 12 7 15 15 8 11 10 8 11 9 10 17 17 14 10 12 12 16 8 12 22 21 12 13 11 13 11 12 12 11 Pvt7, Pvt6, Max William5, John Robert4, Charles G.3, Basil2,
CARRICO 122176   12 21 15  9 12 17 11 15 10 13 12 30 14 9 9 11 11 25 14 21 30 11 12 15 16 11 10 19 22 18 14 18 16 35 37 11 9 12 7 15 15 8 11 10 8 11 9 10 17 17 14 10 12 12 16 8 12 22 21 12 13 11 13 11 12 12 11 Pvt7, Pvt6, Oscar John5, Arthur Wellington4, John Holbert3, Joseph2, Peter1 — of Preston Co., WV
CARRICO 62917 5NKTP 12 21 15  9 12 17 11 14 10 13 12 30 14 9 9 11 11 25 14 21 30 11 12 15 16 11 10 19 22 18 14 19 16 35 37 11 9 12 7 15 15 8 11 10 8 11 9 10 17 17 14 10 12 12 16 8 12 22 21 12 13 11 13 11 12 12 11 Pvt9, Pvt8, Floyd Huston7, Thomas Elisha6, James5, Dennis Sylvester4, James3, Peter II2, Peter I1 — 1674 immigrant to MD
CARICO 86809 US98T 12 21 15  9 12 17 11 15 10 13 12 30 14 9 9 11 11 25 14 21 30 11 12 15 16 11 10 19 22 18 14 19 16 35 38 11 9 12 7 15 15 8 11 10 8 11 9 10 17 17 14 10 12 12 16 8 12 22 21 12 13 11 13 11 12 12 11 Pvt9, Pvt8, Onia Lee7, Samuel Lafayette6, Alexander5, Joseph4, Abel II3, Abel I2, Peter I1 — 1674 immigrant to MD
CARRICO 94556   12 21 15  9 12 17 11 15 10 13 12 30 14 9 9 11 11 25 14 21 30 11 12 15 16 11 10 19 22 18 14 20 16 35 37 11 9 12 7 15 15 8 11 10 8 11 9 10 17 17 14 10 12 12 16 8 12 22 21 12 13 11 13 11 12 12 11 Pvt7, Pvt6, Otha Nicholas5, Alphonsus K.4, Francis Marion3, Henry C.2, John Alexander1 — of Montgomery Co., MD, then PA, then OH, then Martin Co., IN
CARRICO N9852   12 21 15  9 12 17 11 15 10 13 12 30 14 9 9 11 11 25 14 21 30 11 12 15 16 11 10 19 22 18 14 19 16 35 36 11 9 12 7 15 15 8 11 10 8 11 9 10 17 17 14 10 12 12 16 8 12 22 21 12 13 11 13 11 12 12 11 Pvt6, Jesse5, Charles Thomas4, George Henson3, George G.2, James T.1 — of Charles Co., MD, then Washington Co., KY
CARRICO 149914   12 21 15  9 12 17 11 15 10 13 12 30 14 9 9 11 11 25 14 21 30 11 12 15 16 11 10 19 22 18 14 19 16 35 36 11 9 12 7 15 15 8 11 10 8 11 9 10 17 17 14 10 12 12 16 8 12 22 21 12 13 11 13 11 12 12 11 Pvt9, Arthur Burdett8, Ernest7, John6, Thomas Ignatius VI5, Vincent4, Thomas Ignatius I3, Peter II2, Peter I1 — 1674 immigrant to MD
2 CARRICO 146407   12 21 15 10 12 17 11 15 10 13 12 30 14 9 9 11 11 25 14 21 30 11 12 15 16 11 10 19 22 18 14 19 16 35 36 11 9 12 7 15 15 8 11 10 8 11 9 10 17 17 14 10 12 12 16 8 12 22 21 12 13 11 13 11 12 12 11 Pvt4, William Temple3, Francis Marion2, John W.1 — of Prince William Co., VA
BLAINE 136280   12 21 15  9 12 17 11 15 11 13 12 30 14 9 9 11 11 26 14 21 30 11 12 15 16 11 10 19 22 18 14 19 16 35 37 11 9 12 7 15 15 8 11 10 8 11 9 10 17 17 14 10 12 12 16 8 12 22 21 12 13 11 13 11 12 12 11 Pvt11, Pvt10, John Wiley9, Albert8 BLAINE, a.k.a., Blaine8 CARRICO, Wiley C.7, Gordon Kent6, Stephen5, Peter4, Abel II3, Abel I2, Peter I1 — 1674 immigrant to MD
3 CARRICO 121108 WAEPV 12 21 15  9 12 17 11 15 10 13 12 30 14 9 9 11 11 25 14 21 31 11 12 15 16 11 10 19 22 18 14 19 16 35 37 11 9 12 7 15 15 8 11 10 8 11 9 10 17 17 14 10 12 12 17 8 12 21 21 12 13 11 13 11 12 12 11 Pvt6, Pvt5, Joseph Boothe4, John Edward3, Edward2, Cornelius, the elder1 — of MD, Nelson Co., KY, then Washington Co., KY
? CARRICO 155627 M34W6 12 21 15  9 12 17 11 15 10 13 12 30 14 9 9 11 11 25 14 21 30 11 12 15 16 11 10 19 22 18 14 19 16 35 37 11 9                                                             Pvt7, Pvt6, Francis Arnold4, Francis Marion3, Pius2, Nathaniel1 — of MD, then Washington Co., KY
CARRICO ??????   12 21 15  9 12 17 11 15 10 13 12 30                                                                                                               Pvt5, Charles Garfield4, Josephus Cyrus3, Josiah2, Charles1 — of MD, then Washington Co., KY, then Sullivan Co., IN
Our subjects' haplotypes are unique, with no full or even near matches at any level in the FTDNA or Ysearch databases, except with each other.  Five individuals bear the modal haplotype for the group, which is presumed to be the haplotype of their common ancestor.  None of the others tested to 67 markers has less than a 64/67 match with the modal haplotype or less than a 62/67 match with each other.  These matches are close, demonstrating without doubt that they descend from a near common ancestor.  Their haplotypes are not only unique, their closest matches at Ysearch have genetic distances in the realm of 5 at 12 markers, 17 at 25 markers, and 21 at 37 markers.  These genetic distances are huge, and they mean no one remotely related to them "in genealogical time" has yet been tested.  There are no comparable test subjects, at all, in the SMGF (Sorensen Molecular Genealogy Foundation) database.  They are even a poor match (5/12, 11/25, 17/37, 41/67) for the modal values of their own haplogroup subclade.  Their lack of matches stems in part from unusual values at four markers (green table cells):  DYS390, which is most commonly 23, less commonly 22, rarely 21; DYS391, which is generally 10, rarely 9 or 11; DYS392, which is usually 11 in Haplogroup J; and, especially, DYS425, which is usually 12 — 10 is unique!
Once there are enough participants in the study tested to enough markers, we should be able to build an STR "cladogram" of the descendants of Peter CARRICO I.  I have begun such a cladogram, in the form of a "node chart."  Please consider this version of the node chart to be preliminary, constructed mainly as a demonstration of how our data can eventually be used.
#136280 has a deliberate and documented surname change from CARRICO to BLAINE in his lineage.
The individual with ????? for a kit number was tested at FTDNA, but did not join the project, so I don't know his kit number.  The test subject is now deceased. 
A backbone (basic) SNP test result of M172+ confirms that #N9852 is J-2.
#62917, #86809, and #145426 have completed deep SNP testing, with these results:
M304+ M172+ L26+ L27+ M67+ M92- M163- M166-
The positive M304 result proves they are Haplogroup J; the positive M172 result proves they are subclade J-2; the positive results for L26 and L27 prove they are J-2a4; and the positive M67 result proves they are J-2a4b.  The negative results for M92, M163, and M166 prove they are not a subclade of J-2a4b, but rather, root/ancestral J-2a4b*, a.k.a., J-M67.
M267- M62- M365- M390- M367- M368- M369- M289- M340- M47- M68- M339- L24- L25- M137- M158- M12- M102- M205- M99- M280-
The first set of these negative results redundantly proves they are not J-1 or any of its subclades.  The second set of negative results redundantly proves they are not J-2a1 or J-2a2.  The third set of negative results redundantly proves they are not some other subclade of J-2a4.  The last set of negative results redundantly proves they are not J-2b or any of its subclades.

It's a virtual certainty that all CARRICOs with haplotypes matching at the above levels will be the same haplogroup (i.e., have the same SNP mutations).  It is always desirable that a second member undergo these deep SNP tests, as confirmation.  Now that three members have completed this testing, your project admin recommends other members invest in STR testing of additional cousins or maxing out their STR markers, rather than their own deep SNP testing — unless, of course, money is no object or you're just curious, then test away.  There's no such thing as too much proof.

#86809 has undergone a Kittler test proving the order of the two alleles at 385ab is "lo-hi," that is, 12-17.  (Standard testing does not reveal the true order of the two values.  By convention, they are reported "lo-hi," but without a Kittler test, the actual order is unknown.)  Now that one member has taken the Kittler test, there's no real need for anyone else to take it as you should all have the same result.
   
 
Haplogroup J-2a4b* — Advanced Tests
DNA-FP Panel 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 2 5 4 9 4 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 3 9 9 2 * 4 4 4 5 5 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4
Kit # Ysearch
UserID
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
D
Y
S
G
A
T
A
|
A
10
G
G
A
A
T
1B
07
D
Y
F
D
Y
F
D
Y
F
D
Y
F
D
Y
F
D
Y
F
D
Y
F
D
XY
S
413 4
3
4
4
3
5
4
4
1
4
4
5
4
5
2
4
6
1
4
6
2
4
6
3
464 4
8
5
4
9
4
4
9
5
5
0
5
5
2
2
5
3
3
5
4
9
5
5
6
5
7
5
5
8
9
6
3
5
6
3
6
6
3
8
6
4
3
710 7
1
4
7
1
6
7
1
7
724
=CDY
725 7
2
6
371 385 397 399 401 408 411 156
a b c d a b X Y
J2-M172 Modals 9EQTH 17 17     14 12 31 13 11 22 12 13 15 16                     21               35 38           13 11                                              
#6122.70 - Hg J-2f (=J-2a4b) 17 17     14 12 31 12 11 22         16   14               24     10             28 28 31 31   12   9c 12t 10c 14c                   19 21                
86809 US98T 17 17 9 11 14 11 31 14 11 22 11g 12g 15g 16g 16 10 14 11 11 10 13 11 10 11 22 10 11 10 33.2 26 27 20 35 38 28 28 32 32 12 12 11 9c 10t 10c 14c 10 10 13 14 15 15 21c 22t 24.1t 16 19 188 188 9 10 11 12 7 12
145426   17 17                 11g 12g 15g 16g                             33.2   27   35 37 28 28 32 32       9c 10t 10c 14c 10 10 13 14 15 15 21c 22t 24.1t 16 19 188 188 9 10 11 12    
62917 5NKTP                                                                                   9c 10t 10c 14c                                      
94556                                                           33.2                                                                      
With the acquisition of the German company, DNA-Fingerprint, FTDNA gained access to their stable of DNA tests.  These tests can be ordered in panels or "a la carte" from among the "Advanced" tests on your FTDNA member page.  So far, only one member has ordered all of the available STR tests (i.e., all the ones not duplicated in the FTDNA 67-marker set) — please see this table for a list of these markers.  I strongly urge all project members to "max out" their markers to find mutations that can separate lines.
Note that three markers in the "Palindromic Pack" (Panel 5) are duplicates of markers tested among the Standard markers panels (emphasized in dark grey in the table header).  While we don't learn anything new with regard to DYS413 and DYS724 (=CDYa/b), we do learn the allele types for DYS464, which can be either type c (cytosine) or type g (guanine).  It's cheaper to test the entire Palindromic Pack, so there's no point in cherry-picking the untested markers just to avoid repeating tests.

Only two members have tested the Palindromic Pack, which is usually the most variable of all the marker panels — hence, the motivation for testing it.  The CARRICOs continue to be remarkably stable because the only difference between the two is at DYS724 (i.e., CDYb), a difference already discoverd by testing Standard marker panel 26-37.  I would still urge all members to test the Palindromic Pack because it still remains our best hope for finding mutations.

*DYS710 is a new marker that is alleged to be a "high frequency mutator," so it should be useful for genealogical purposes.  In STR testing, not all repeats are complete segments.  When results are reported, the partial segments can be rounded up, rounded down, or expressed as a decimal fraction.  In the case of DYS710, it has a 0.2 "micro allele," a partial segment that may or may not be present (please see frequency distribution of DYS710 results on the DNP-Fingerprint web site).  A result of 33.2 occurs in 12% of those tested.
DYS425 is part of the DYF371 palindromic set.  The nearly universal value for this marker is 12, so its rare value of 10 raised the question as to whether there are any other anomalies in this set.  DYS425 shows up here as the t-allele in the DYF371 set; our CARRICOs appear to be the only individuals ever tested to have a value of 10t at this marker.  A value of 9 for any of the DYF371 alleles is uncommon, being known in just a few individuals, all of whom are Haplogroup J.  Our closest match in the DNA-Fingerprint Ymatch database is #6122.70, who is the only J-2f (=J-2a4b) in the database; he has the "normal" value of 12 for the t-allele.

To compare results of advanced markers, see the DNA-Fingerprint Ymatch database.  You can pull up all results in the database by entering % in any field (except "country").  You can pull up results for all subclades of Haplogroup J by entering just "j" in the "yhgroup" field.  I have compiled modal values of all haplogroups currently in the database, plus I've extracted the single J-2f (=J-2a4b) haplotype and included those values in the table above.

Don't be confused by the ordering of the numbers in the database or in your test results.  By convention, the laboratories automatically put the alleles in alpha-numeric order, from low to high; hence, the DYF371 results were returned by FTDNA as 9c-10c-10t-14c.  But when comparing results, the single t-allele is customarilly placed second, so the order is changed in the table above.  Not everyone in the Ymatch database corrected the order of their results as they entered them, so you see the t-allele in various positions there.


Haplogroup J-2a4b-1 = J-M92
The mutation defining this subclade (M92) occurred an estimated 8.8 ± 2.3 thousand years ago.  Today, the subclade can found in southern and eastern Europe, the Middle East, central and southern Asia, northeastern Africa, and India.  It is most concentrated in southern Italy, southern Greece, Turkey, Egypt, and India.  See Figure 2, Map F in Semino et al. (2004. American Journal of Human Genetics 74(5):1023-1034) for distribution of J-M92.
To view lineages, please scroll to the right.
Surname Kit # Ysearch
User ID

Most
Downstream
SNP
actually tested
Haplotype— as determined by STR testing Known Lineage
Markers 1-12 Markers 13-25 Markers 26-37 Markers 38-67
3
9
3
3
9
0
19
/
3
9
4
3
9
1
a
|
3
8
5
b
|
3
8
5
4
2
6
3
8
8
4
3
9
i
|
3
8
9
3
9
2
ii
|
3
8
9
4
5
8
a
|
4
5
9
b
|
4
5
9
4
5
5
4
5
4
4
4
7
4
3
7
4
4
8
4
4
9
a
|
4
6
4
b
|
4
6
4
c
|
4
6
4
d
|
4
6
4
4
6
0
H4
|
G
A
T
A
IIa
|
Y
C
A
IIb
|
Y
C
A
4
5
6
6
0
7
5
7
6
5
7
0
a
|
C
D
Y
b
|
C
D
Y
4
4
2
4
3
8
5
3
1
5
7
8
a
|
S1
3
9
5
b
|
S1
3
9
5
5
9
0
5
3
7
6
4
1
4
7
2
S1
4
0
6
5
1
1
4
2
5
a
|
4
1
3
b
|
4
1
3
5
5
7
5
9
4
4
3
6
4
9
0
5
3
4
4
5
0
4
4
4
4
8
1
5
2
0
4
4
6
6
1
7
5
6
8
4
8
7
5
7
2
6
4
0
4
9
2
5
6
5
M172 Modals 9EQTH   12 23 14 10 13 17 11 15 12 13 11 29 16 8 9 11 11 26 15 21 29 12 13 15 16 10 10 19 22 15 14 16 17 35 38 11 9 11 7 14 15 8 11 10 8 11 9 12 17 17 14 10 12 12 15 8 12 22 21 13 12 11 13 11 12 12 11 Modals compiled by Al Aburto, Jr., as of 24 Feb 2008 (n=2316).
M92 Modals NFNYH   12 22 14 10 14 15 11 15 12 14 11 31 15 9 9 11 11 26 15 20 29 13 13 15 16 10 10 19 22 15 12 15 17 34 36 12 9 10 7 15 15 8 11 10 8 11 9 0 17 17 15 10 12 12 15 8 11 22 21 13 12 11 13 11 12 12 11 Modals for markers 1-37 compiled by Al Aburto, Jr.; as of 21 Jul 2006.*
                 
CARRICO 88790 - M172 12 22 15 10 13 15 11 15 11 14 11 32 15 9 9 11 11 26 14 21 31 12 13 16 17  9 10 19 22 15 13 15 18 35 37 11 9 11 7 15 15 8 11 10 8 12 9 0 17 18 14 10 12 12 15 8 12 22 21 15 12 11 13 11 12 12 11 Pvt3, Pvt2, Joaquim Anastor1 — emigrant from Portugal to Brazil
While he is only a 44/67 match with the modal haplotype for J-2a4b-1, he carries the characteristic null425 marker of this group (bright yellow table cell).  The DYF371X test (see small table to the right) elucidates this region of the chromosome (the region surrounding and including DYS425), revealing the "c" nucleotide base causing the null reading at DYS425.  Like the other CARRICOs (above), his haplotype is unique, with no matches at any level in the FTDNA database; however, he has none of the very odd markers that make them so unusual.
As part of its haplogroup assurance policy, FTDNA has given this individual a gratis "backbone" SNP test, with the result M172+ proving he is Haplogroup J-2.
  # DYF371X
Modals for All Haplogroups   10c 12t 13c 14c
Haplogroup J2f 6122.70 9c 12t 10c 14c
CARRICO 88790 9c 12c 10c 14c
#6122.70 is the only J2f (=J2a1b) in the DNA-FP database (as of May 2007).
*Modals for markers 38-67 compiled by DGM from the Y-DNA Hap J Project as of 1 Jun 2008 (n=16).

What constitutes a match?
Matches in other surnames are usually mere coincidence, so please ignore them — I'll let you know when you shouldn't!
For 12 markers:  9 or less is a non-relative; 10-12, please see this Chart compiled by FTDNA.
For 25 markers:  21 or less is a non-relative; 22-25, please see this Chart compiled by FTDNA.
For 37 markers:  31 or less is a non-relative; 32-37, please see this Chart compiled by FTDNA.
For 67 markers:  55 or less is a non-relative; 56-67, please see this Chart compiled by FTDNA.
For any test:  0 matching markers, please contact NASA.

 
Contact Home
Page
Table of
Contents
DNA
Hub
Biddle
DNA
Carrico
DNA
Corbin
DNA
Danish
DNA
Rasey
DNA
Straub
DNA
Pedigree
Charts
Census
Hubs
Every-Name
Indices

Go to Home Page
Privacy Policy ______
Go to Home Page

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

-