Go to Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Diana, Goddess of the Hunt — for Ancestors!
 
Go to Every-Name Index
Every-Name Index
 
Node Chart for the Descendants of Peter CARRICO I, 1674 Immigrant to Maryland
This "node chart" is actually a cladogram, similar to the one familiar to you showing the branching relationships between haplogroup subclades.  Each fork or "node" in a cladogram represents the appearance of a new mutation.  In the case of the haplotree, it's a new SNP mutation; in the case of the node chart (below), it's a new STR mutation.  In the node chart, the branching cladogram is represented by a table, similar to the table I used to represent the Haplogroup J cladogram.
VIEWING TIP:  You can view more of the chart at one time if you reduce the text size in your browser.
I realize that, at first, these charts may seem complicated, but once you grasp the concept of creating a descendant tree by plotting the appearance of new mutations, it really becomes quite simple.  We just need a lot more participants to make it work and, as always, better paper documentation.  DNA testing needs to used as a tool to support a pedigree when it's correct and falsify it when it's wrong, but it cannot be used instead of a paper pedigree, not at the levels we are currently testing.  (With advances in technology, we may reach that point at an affordable price.)

If you find any part of this page difficult to understand or in need of improvement, please don't hesitate to contact me.  The chart as given is tentative, used to demonstrate how STR data can be used to authenticate pedigrees.  We are at the beginning of a long quest, one that will take many more participants (and thus years) to come to full fruition.  However, it's useful to construct even a preliminary chart because it tells us which data we need most, that is, which descendants we should be giving priority to finding and funding.

UPDATE (9 Sep 2009):  It appears that the mutation from 37 to 36 at CDYb has happened, independently, at least twice in this family, once downstream of Charles CARRICO and once in or downstream of Thomas Ignatius CARRICO I, if not more.  CDYa and CDYb are among the most volatile of all markers, so this finding is not extraordinary.  An alternative explanation is that the descendant of Josiah has had a back-mutation and Charles really did have the mutation.  The testing of cousins can help determine which.
UPDATE (10 Mar 2011)  It appears that the mutation from 37 to 38 at CDYb has happened, independently, twice in this family, once downstream of Abel II and once downstream of Floyd Huston.  CDY thus maintains its reputation of being one of the most volatile of all markers.  It is supposed second only to DYS464, but my experience in this and other projects is that it is the most volatile marker.
Peter I had three known sons:  Peter II, Abel I, and James I.  As of this writing, no one has proven a paper descent from James I, though there seems little doubt that he had at least some children, which would account for some of the "loose ends" among the CARRICOs in Kentucky.
Four individuals, so far, are modal at all 67 markers, which proves they have a common ancestor with the rest, but gives no clue as to how they are related to each other or to other family members.  These individuals will need to max out their markers to refine their relationships; however, the rest of the family will need to do so, as well, for them to have anything to serve as a basis for comparison.  The markers most likely to reveal differences are DYS710 and the Palindromic Pack.  The project will pay the Transfer Fee for anyone testing DYS710.
Pale yellow table cells indicate no mutation has occurred.  Pale grey table cells indicate a mutation must have taken place, but it's unknown in which generation it occurred (the testing of more cousins can reveal the locations of these mutations).  Dark grey table cells indicate a line with an NPE in the lineage.  White table cells indicate lines not yet tested.
Node Chart of the Descendants of Peter CARRICO I, 1674 Immigrant to Maryland
Generation Remarks
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Peter I
b. <1660
unk unk unk Nathaniel
b. ca. 1782
Pius
b. 1810
Francis
Marion
b. 1853
Francis
Arnold
b. 1899
Pvt #155627 This individual has a 37/37 match with the family's modal haplotype, but we don't know if he has acquired any mutations in Markers 38-67. 
unk unk Henry
b. ca. 1760s
Cornelius,
the younger
b. 1797/8
Ignatius
Francis
b. 1834
William
Constantine
b. 1861
Joseph
Haesley
b. 1893
Thomas
Francis
b. 1920
Pvt #107978 These individuals bear the modal haplotype for the family so are presumed to have descended from Peter I without acquiring any mutations.
unk unk unk Matthew
Gillaspie
b. 1807-10
William
David
b. 1852
Winant
Gillaspy
b. 1867
Pvt
b. ca. 1890s
#145426  
unk unk unk James
b. 1782/3
Proteus
b. 1822
Thomas
John
b. 1849
Walter
Scott
b. 1879
Pvt #157080  
unk unk Peter
b. <1765
Joseph
b. 1792
John
Holbert
b. 1821
Arthur
Wellington
b. 1866
Walter
Lemuel
b. 1892
Pvt #122177  
Oscar
John
b. 1895
Pvt #122176
DYS576=19>18
This individual has acquired one mutation in his descent from Arthur Wellington.
unk unk Charles
b. 1770-75
Reason
b. 8 Feb 1794
William
G.
b. 1830/1
George
Harrison
b. 1856
William
"Willie"
b. 1882
#132113 These two brothers are Halogroup R1b, which means they must have an NPE in their line somewhere downstream of Charles and upstream of their father.  It had long been suspected that either Reason or Basil must have been adopted because their birthdates are spaced too closely  for them to be brothers.  Apparently, the adoptee is Reason, and given that Charles's wife is surnamed REASON, he is likely her kin.
#143862
Basil
b. 11 May 1794
John J.
b. 1826/7
        We need to test a brother of Charles G. to determine Basil's status with regard to the CDYb mutation
Benjamin
b. 1831
       
Charles
G.
b. 1835/6
John
Robert
b. 1860
Max
William
b. 1914
Pvt #143924
CDYb=37>36
This individual carries the CDYb mutation, which he either acquired downstream of Charles — or the descendant of Josiah has had a back-mutation.
Reason
b. 1836/7
        We need to test a brother of Charles G. to determine Basil's status with regard to the CDYb mutation
Elza
b. 1843/4
       
Josiah
b. 1803/4
Josephus
Cyrus
b. 1837
Charles
Garfield
b. 1885
#????? It may seem that a generation must have been skipped, but Josephus married late and our test subject was an elderly man who is now deceased.  He tested only 12 markers, but is a 12/12 match with the family's modal haplotype.  His Kit # is unknown because, while he was tested at FTDNA, he has not joined the project. We desperately need his contact to upgrade him to 67 markers.
John
b. 1831/2
      We need to test a brother of Basil Jordan to determine Josiah's status with regard to the CDYb mutation.
Isaac
Owen
b. 1841/2
     
Basil
Jordan
b. 1848/9
Jos.
Converse
b. 1873
Pvt #160239 This individual has descended from Peter I without acquiring any new mutations — either that or he has had a back-mutation at CDYb.
unk John James
T.
b. 1764
Matthew
W.
b. 1791
        Tesing a brother of George G., to determine the status of marker CDYb for James T., has very high priority.
Francis
L.
b. 1792
       
George
G.
b. ca. 1796
George
Henson
b. 1827
Charles
Thomas
b. 1864
Jesse
b. 1913
#N9852
CDYb=37>36
This individual carries the CDYb mutation, which may mean he descends from Thomas Ignatius I.
Aquila
b. 1790
        Tesing a brother of George G., to determine the status of marker CDYb for James T., has very high priority.
Alexander
b. 1800
       
James
b. ca. 1805
       
unk unk unk unk John
W.
b. 1826/7
Francis
Marion
b. 1861
William
Temple
b. 1886
#146407
CDYb=37>36
DYS391=9>10
This individual carries the CDYb mutation, which may mean he descends from Thomas Ignatius I.  He also bears an additional mutation, resumably acquired downstream of that common ancestor.
unk unk Cornelius
the elder
b. 1771/2
Edward
b. 1809/10
Thomas
Henry
bap. 1837
      -
James
Madison
b. 1844
      -
William
Reason
b. 1846
      -
Robert
Thos Jef
b. 1849
      -
John
Edward
b. 1851
Joseph
Boothe
b. 1880
Pvt #121108
DYS449=30>31
DYS534=16>17
DYS481=22>21
This individual has acquired three mutations in his descent from Peter I.
unk unk
(Peter III?)
John
Alexander
b. 1775-80
John
b. 1804/5
        -
Henry
C.
b. 1808
Frances
Marion
b. 1834/5
Alphonsus
K.
b. 1871
Otha
Nicholas
b. 1901
Pvt #94556
DYS576=19>20
This individual has acquired one mutation in his descent from Peter I.
James
b. 1814/5
        -
Peter II
b. 1680s
Peter III
b. ca. 1722
            -
John I
b. ca. 1739
            -
Thomas
Ignatius I
b. 1740/1
James
b. 1774/5
          Testing a brother of Vincent, to determine the status of marker CDYb for Thomas Ignatius, has very high priority.
Levi
b. ca. 1780
         
Joseph
b. ca. 1781
         
Vincent
b. ca. 1784
Thomas
Ignatius VI
b. 1820
John
b. 1857/8
Ernest
b. 1884
Arthur
Burdett
b. 1906
Pvt #149914
CDYb=37>36
This individual carries the CDYb mutation, which may mean one or more of the others who bear this same mutation also descend from Thomas Ignatius I.
James II
b. <1745
Vincent
b. 1765-70
          -
Walter
b. 1770-80
          -
Dennis
Sylvester
b. 1774
James
b. 1816/7
Thomas
Elisha
b. 1872
Floyd
Huston
b. 1900
#197948
CDYb=37>38
This individual has acquired one mution in his descent from Peter I.  Because his nephew does not share this mutation, it had to have happened in him.
Pvt #62917
DYS388=15>14
This individual has acquired one mutation in his descent from Peter I. Because his uncle does not share the mutation, it had to have happened either in him or in his father.
James
b. 1774-78
          -
John
Martin
b. 1774-84
          -
Alexander
b. 1784-90
          -
Bartholomew
b. ca. 1745
            -
Basil
b. 1750s
            -
James I
b. 1692/3
              James is alleged to have had sons; but, as yet, no one has proven a paper connection to him.
Abel I
b. <1707
Abel II
b. 1744
William
b. 1766/7
          -
Peter
b. 1770/1
Wilkerson
b. 1801/2
        -
Stephen
b. 1814/5
Gordon
Kent
b. 1843
Wiley C.
b. 1877-79
Blaine
CARRICO
a.k.a.,
Albert
BLAINE
b. 1900
John
Wiley
BLAINE
b. 1922
Pvt #136280
DYS439=10>11
DYS447=25>26
This individual has acquired two mutations in his descent from Abel II.
Harold
b. 1818
        -
Abel III
b. 1780/1
          -
Joseph
b. 1784
Alexander
b. 1811
Samuel
Lafayette
b. 1851
Onia
Lee
b. 1878
Pvt #86809
CDYb=37>38
This individual has acquired one mutation in his descent from Abel II.
Mumford
b. 1811
        -
Joseph
b. 1839/40
        -
Simms
b. 1790/93
          -
Return to Haplogroup J-2a4b Results table.
Contact Home
Page
Table of
Contents
DNA
Hub
Biddle
DNA
Carrico
DNA
Corbin
DNA
Cupp
DNA
Danish
DNA
Ely
DNA
Lyon(s)
DNA
Rasey
DNA
Reason
DNA
Rose
DNA
Straub
DNA
Pedigree
Charts
Census
Hubs
Every-Name
Indices

Table of Contents
'Diana of Versailles' Louvre Museum [PD-US]
Privacy Policy ______
Every-Name Index
'Diana of Versailles' Louvre Museum [PD-US]